CVI Try JCM online
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
CVI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 16 January 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
CVI.00398-07v1
15/3/425    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perry, S.
Right arrow Articles by Parsonnet, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perry, S.
Right arrow Articles by Parsonnet, J.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. doi:10.1128/CVI.00398-07
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Reproducibility of QuantiFERON®-TB GOLD In-tube Assay

Sharon Perry*, Luz Sanchez, Shufang Yang, Zubin Agarwal, Philip Hurst, and Julie Parsonnet

Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, US; Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospitals System, San Jose CA, US

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: shnperry{at}stanford.edu.


   Abstract

Background: Studies are needed to characterize reproducibility of the QuantiFERON-TB GOLD® in targeted US screening populations. Methods: Members of Northern California households were tested with the QuantiFERON-TB Gold® In-Tube assay (QFT-G-IT) at two home visits 3 months apart. Reproducibility and agreement with TST were assessed. Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate the role of test-related error. Results. Of 63 individuals (49 adults and 14 children) completing QFT-G-IT at both time points, 79% were foreign-born (98% Latin America) and 68% reported Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination. At baseline, 23 (37%) were TST positive and 15 (24%) were QFT-G-IT positive ({kappa} =0.48 [+/- 0.11]). At 3 months, 3/48 (6.3%; 95% CI: 2-17) initially QFT-G-IT negative converted, and 5/15 (33%; 9% 5CI: 15-58) initially QFT-G-IT positive reverted. Among the 8 individuals with inconsistent QFT-G-IT results, the maximum IFN-{gamma} response at either visit was 0.68 IU/ml vs. a mean of 4.99 (+/- 3.74) and 6.95 (+/-5.6) in 10 persistent positives, at 1st and 2nd visits respectively. Expected false reversion and conversion rates were 32% (90CI, 25-39) and 6.95 (90CI, 4.6-9.8) when the sensitivity and specificity were assumed to average 70% and 98%, respectively. Conclusions: Transient responses to QFT-G-IT are common, and low positive results need to be interpreted with caution. Further studies are needed to characterize the predictive value of the test in US foreign-born and other targeted screening populations.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.