CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
CVI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 2 January 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
CVI.00282-07v1
15/3/575    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NOVAK-WEEKLEY, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by HOLLINGSWORTH, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NOVAK-WEEKLEY, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by HOLLINGSWORTH, M. H.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. doi:10.1128/CVI.00282-07
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

A Study Comparing the Premier Toxins A & B and C. difficile TOX A/B II Assays for Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection

SUSAN M. NOVAK-WEEKLEY* and MICHELE H. HOLLINGSWORTH

Kaiser Permanente Regional Reference Laboratory, North Hollywood, California, 11668 Sherman Way, North Hollywood, California 91605

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: Susan M. Novak{at}kp.org.


   Abstract

Clostridium difficile causes nosocomial diarrhea and is responsible for complications including pseudomembranous colitis, megacolon, or perforation. Using 442 stool specimens, we compared sensitivity and specificity of the Premier Toxins A & B (Meridian Bioscience, Inc.), and C. difficile TOX A/B II (TechLab, Inc., Blacksburg, VA) immunoassays in the Kaiser Permanente Regional Reference Laboratories, Virology Department. The Premier Toxins A & B assay demonstrated higher sensitivity (97.44%) and positive predictive value (79.17%) than the C. difficile TOX A/B II assay (87.18% and 75.56%) while assay specificities and negative predictive values were similar.

We also performed experiments using serially diluted purified toxin A and B antigens to understand the basis for assay differences. Both assays' toxin A antibodies detected toxin A at comparable levels. Preliminary results indicated the Premier Toxins A & B toxin B antibody could detect toxin B at a 125 pg/100 µl concentration, while the C. difficile TOX A/B II toxin B antibody could not detect toxin B below the 250 pg/100 µl concentration. Therefore, the Premier Toxins A & B assay provides greater sensitivity than the C. difficile TOX A/B II assay, perhaps due to a superior detection ability of its toxin B antibody.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.