CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
CVI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 24 October 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
CVI.00242-07v1
14/12/1550    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saha, D C
Right arrow Articles by Singh, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saha, D C
Right arrow Articles by Singh, N

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clin. Vaccine Immunol. doi:10.1128/CVI.00242-07
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Serologic Evidence For Reactivation Cryptococcosis In Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

D C Saha, D L Goldman, X Shao, A Casadevall, S Husain, A P Limaye, M Lyon, J Somani, K Pursell, T L Pruett, and N Singh*

All India Institute of Medicine, New Delhi, India, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx NY, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh PA University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Washington, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA


   Abstract

Background: Cryptococcosis is a significant infection with a high mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Nonetheless, the pathogenesis of this disease is poorly understood. It has been hypothesized that cryptococcosis may result from either primary infection or reactivation of a latent infection.

Methods: Sera were obtained from transplant recipients prior to transplantation and at the time they developed cryptococcosis. Control sera were obtained before and after transplant from patients who did not develop cryptococcosis. Sera were tested for antibodies against C. neoformans using an immunoblot assay. Antibody responses were also compared with those observed in rats with experimental pulmonary cryptococcosis

Findings: In all 52% of the transplant recipients who developed cryptococcosis exhibited serologic evidence of cryptococcal infection before transplantation. These patients developed cryptococcosis significantly earlier after transplant when compared to patients without pre-existing reactivity (5.6 ± 3.4 vs 40.6± 63.8 months p=0.0011).

Interpretation: The results from our study suggest that a substantial proportion of transplant associated cryptococcosis results from the reactivation of a latent infection. These findings also highlight the potential utility of serologic studies in identifying those patients at risk for the development of cryptococcosis after transplantation.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.