Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, October 2005, p. 1177-1183, Vol. 12, No. 10
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.10.1177-1183.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Clinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland,1 Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078,2 Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ronda de Toledo s/n, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain,3 Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616,4 Department of Veterinary Pathology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Neston Wirral, CH64 7TE, United Kingdom,5 Department of Farm Animals, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland,6 Federal Veterinary Office, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3003 Bern, Switzerland7
Received 27 March 2005/ Returned for modification 3 May 2005/ Accepted 7 July 2005
In the context of a serosurvey conducted on the Anaplasma marginale prevalence in Swiss cattle, we suspected that a serological cross-reactivity between A. marginale and A. phagocytophilum might exist. In the present study we demonstrate that cattle, sheep and horses experimentally infected with A. phagocytophilum not only develop antibodies to A. phagocytophilum (detected by immunofluorescent-antibody assay) but also to A. marginale (detected by a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Conversely, calves experimentally infected with A. marginale also developed antibodies to A. phagocytophilum using the same serological tests. The identity of 63% determined in silico within a 209-amino-acid sequence of major surface protein 5 of an isolate of A. marginale and one of A. phagocytophilum supported the observed immunological cross-reactivity. These observations have important consequences for the serotesting of both, A. marginale and A. phagocytophilum infection of several animal species. In view of these new findings, tests that have been considered specific for either infection must be interpreted carefully.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. | Infect. Immun. |
|---|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | J. Virol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |