CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Erratum for Schultz et al., Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 9 (2) 295-298.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bucsky, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bucsky, P.

 Previous Article

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 2002, p. 738, Vol. 9, No. 3
1071-412X/02/$04.00+0     DOI:
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

ERRATUM

Influence of Specimen Age and Use of Different Negative Controls in Determination of Intracytoplasmic Levels of Cytokines after Whole-Blood Culture Assay

Christian Schultz, Christina Rott, Petra Temming, Julia von Puttkammer, and Peter Bucsky

Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

Volume 9, no. 2, p. 295-298, 2002. Page 297, column 1: line 7 from bottom and below should read as follows. "The greatest mean difference was seen for IL-8, with a 44.9% higher amount of IL-8 positive monocytes (95% CI, 33.7% to 56%; P < 0.0001) compared to the purified antibody-blocking control, followed by a 29% higher amount of IL-6-positive cells (95% CI, 16.7% to 41.3%; P < 0.0001), a 19.4% higher amount of IFN-{gamma}-positive cells (95% CI, 14.3% to 24.6%; P < 0.0001), and a 14.5% higher amount of IL-2 positive cells (95% CI, 10.7% to 18.2%; P < 0.0001)."

Page 297, column 2: line 10 from bottom and below should read as follows. " ... then the number of IL-6 positive monocytes was 69.3% higher (95% CI, 37.8% to 100.7%; P < 0.0001) than that obtained with the purified antibody-blocking control, followed by a 26.9% higher amount of IFN-{lambda}-positive lymphocytes (95% CI, 20.9% to 32.8%; P < 0.0001) and a 18.8% higher amount of IL-2-positive lymphocytes (95% CI, 13.7% to 24%; P < 0.0001). In the determination of IL-8, 6 values were below and 14 values above those of the purified antibody-blocking control (18.7%; 95% CI, 14.5% to 22.9%; P < 0.05)."


Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 2002, p. 738, Vol. 9, No. 3
1071-412X/02/$04.00+0     DOI:
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bucsky, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bucsky, P.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS