CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bode, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rothenbacher, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bode, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rothenbacher, D.
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 2002, p. 493-495, Vol. 9, No. 2
1071-412X/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.9.2.493-495.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children: Comparison of a Salivary Immunoglobulin G Antibody Test with the [13C]Urea Breath Test

G. Bode,1* P. Marchildon,2 J. Peacock,2 H. Brenner,3 and D. Rothenbacher3

Department of Epidemiology, University of Ulm, Ulm,1 Department of Epidemiology, German Centre for Research on Ageing, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany,3 Enteric Products, Inc., Stony Brook, New York2

Received 10 September 2001/ Returned for modification 11 October 2001/ Accepted 20 November 2001


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Text
 References
 
The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in a population-based sample of 477 children (mean age ± standard deviation, 5.8 ± 0.5 years) determined by the [13C]urea breath test ([13C]UBT) was 10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1 to 13.8%), and that determined by salivary enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was 11.9% (95% CI, 9.2 to 15.2%). Compared to the [13C]UBT, the sensitivity and specificity of the salivary ELISA were 80.9% (95% CI, 66.3 to 90.4%) and 95.3% (95% CI, 92.7 to 97.1%), respectively.


   TEXT
Top
 Abstract
 Text
References
 
For the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children, endoscopy is not clinically indicated and is not feasible in most studies. Noninvasive diagnosis of H. pylori infection can be done by measuring specific anti-H. pylori immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in serum or saliva with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IgG-ELISA), with the [13C]urea breath test ([13C]UBT), and with an enzyme immunoassay (HpSA) for antigens in stools (3, 12-14, 16-18, 21-25). Whole saliva as a test sample is easily accessible, and despite some less encouraging results with H. pylori testing (9, 19, 23), some studies seem to be promising (1, 6, 10, 11, 15).

The [13C]UBT has been shown to be an extremely accurate method of detecting H. pylori infection because it has the advantage of evaluating the gastric mucosa as a whole, thereby avoiding the sampling errors inherent in biopsy (4, 5, 7). Furthermore, as previously shown, the [13C]UBT is an excellent diagnostic test in children 5 years of age and older and can be considered another "gold standard," especially if endoscopy is not indicated (5, 7, 8).

In this study, we investigated the salivary anti-H. pylori IgG immune response in a population-based sample of school-age children. The performance of the salivary assay was assessed against the [13C]UBT as the gold standard for establishing H. pylori infection.

Study subjects were 477 randomly selected children 5 to 7 years old (mean age ± standard deviation, 5.8 ± 0.5 years) (Table 1) living in Ulm, Germany, who were examined for school fitness by the Public Health Service in 1998. A total of 71.7% of the children were of German nationality, 13.0% were of Turkish nationality, and 15.3% were of other than German or Turkish nationality. Participation in the study was voluntary, and informed consent of parents was obtained for each child. The study was approved by the Ethics Board of the University of Ulm.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Various demographic characteristics of the study population

 
The [13C]UBT was performed as described previously (2, 20). Sixty milligrams of [13C]urea (99.5% C; Mass Trace, Woburn, Mass.) was dissolved in 200 ml of apple juice (pH 2.2 to 2.4). Breath samples were collected into plastic bags before and 30 min after intake of the apple juice and were analyzed with an isotope-selective nondispersive infrared spectrometer (Wagner Analytical Systems, Bremen, Germany). A test was regarded to be H. pylori positive if the difference between the baseline 13CO2/12CO2 ratio and the 30-min 13CO2/12CO2 ratio exceeded 4{per thousand}.

To minimize the possibility of false-negative [13C]UBT results, children who had received antibiotic treatment within the previous 4 weeks, which could influence the [13C]UBT, were excluded from the analysis. None of the children had received proton pump inhibitors, H2 blockers, bismuth salts, or antacids within the prior 4 weeks.

Before the [13C]UBT was conducted, whole saliva was collected with a special saliva sampling device (Salivette; Sarstedt, Nürnberg, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Children were asked to chew thoroughly a cotton wool swab for 1 min. The cotton wool swab was then placed into the suspended insert of the sampling device, and the saliva was centrifuged (3,500 rpm for 5 min) and frozen at -80°C until analysis.

Evaluation of saliva IgG against H. pylori antigens was performed with a modification of a commercially available ELISA kit (HM-CAP; Enteric Products, Inc., Stony Brook, N.Y.) in blinded fashion. Serological tests based on this kit have been shown to have high agreement with the [13C]UBT in adults (13, 14) and in children (4, 24). One hundred microliters of whole saliva was added to the wells of a modified HM-CAP antigen preparation without dilution and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. The wells were washed three times, and 100 µl of peroxidase-conjugated anti-human IgG was added and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. The wells were further washed three times, and 100 µl of TMB substrate was added and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped with 100 µl of 1 N sulfuric acid, and results were read on a spectrophotometer at 450 nm. The results were calculated from a three-point linear regression curve and extrapolated into ELISA values (values of >2.2 were positive, values of <1.8 were negative, and values of >1.8 and <2.2 were indeterminate).

Table 2 shows that H. pylori infection could be detected in 51 children (10.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1 to 13.8%) as determined by the [13C]UBT and in 57 children (11.9%; 95% CI, 9.2 to 15.2%) as determined by the salivary ELISA. Twenty-four of the 477 saliva test results (5%) were indeterminate and were excluded from further analysis. Compared to the results of the [13C]UBT, the sensitivity and specificity of the salivary antibody ELISA in children were 80.9% (95% CI, 66.3 to 90.4%) and 95.3% (95% CI, 92.7 to 97.1%), respectively (Table 3). Overall, the resulting positive predictive value (PPV) was 66.7% (95% CI, 52.8 to 78.3%), and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 97.7% (95% CI, 95.6 to 98.9%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Performance of salivary ELISA versus [13C]UBT in 477 children

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Salivary IgG-ELISA compared to [13C]UBT

 
As the prevalence varied between children of German nationality (3.2% [95% CI, 1.6 to 5.7%] as determined by [13C]UBT) and children of other than German nationality (29.6% [95% CI, 22.1 to 38.1%] as determined by [13C]UBT), we also calculated the test performance separately in the two groups. The sensitivity and specificity in children with German nationality and in children with other than German nationality were very similar, but the PPV was much higher in non-German children (81.1% [95% CI, 64.3 to 91.4%]), whereas the NPV was higher in German children (99.0% [95% CI, 96.9 to 99.7%]), due to the different prevalences in the two groups.

In this population-based study of children, we could show that compared to [13C]UBT, the accuracy of salivary ELISA was very high, indicating that it seems to be a reliable, convenient, and easy-to-use tool, which may especially be valuable in the context of epidemiological studies.

Studies performed with saliva of adult patients show an overall sensitivity of 81 to 94% and a specificity of 70 to 90% compared with endoscopy-based methods (6, 10, 12, 17, 20, 24). The PPV and the NPV range from 76 to 84% and from 60 to 80%, respectively. Data obtained from children referred for endoscopy show comparable sensitivity (93%) and specificity (82%) when tested against histology and the urease test (10). Two studies investigated asymptomatic children by using either a serology-based test (sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 87%) or the [13C]UBT (sensitivity, 65%; specificity, 95%) (1, 12). The results obtained with the HM-CAP ELISA kit in this study for asymptomatic children (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 95%) compared to the [13C]UBT are promising. In particular, the high NPV (98%) confirms the suitability of the test to exclude H. pylori infection with a high probability.

The choice of a test for noninvasive diagnosis of H. pylori infection depends mainly on the accuracy, the availability, and the costs of the test. The salivary ELISA is a very reasonable device in this respect, but there is a need to evaluate the test further with young children in whom the immune response against H. pylori is not fully developed (18).

In conclusion, whole-saliva-based IgG-ELISA may be of particular interest as a tool to study H. pylori infection in children in epidemiological studies, as it allows screening of a large number of children with a noninvasive method with high acceptance and very good practicability.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Epidemiology, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 22, D-89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049 731 5031072. Fax: 0049 731 5031069. E-mail: guenter.bode{at}medizin.uni-ulm.de. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Ballam, L. D., M. A. Mendall, M. Asante, J. Morris, D. P. Strachan, P. H. Whincup, and D. G. Cook. 2000. Western blotting is useful in the salivary diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. J. Clin. Pathol. 53:314-317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bode, G., D. Rothenbacher, H. Brenner, and G. Adler. 1998. Variation in the 13C-urea breath test value by nationality in Helicobacter pylori infected children. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 33:468-472.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Braden, B., H. G. Posselt, P. Ahrens, R. Kitz, C. F. Dietrich, and W. F. Caspary. 2000. New immunoassay in stool provides an accurate noninvasive diagnostic method for Helicobacter pylori screening in children. Pediatrics 106:115-117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chong, S. K. F., Q. Lou, M. A. Asnicar, S. E. Zimmerman, J. M. Croffie, C.-H. Lee, and J. F. Fitzgerald. 1995. Helicobacter pylori infection in recurrent abdominal pain in childhood: comparison of diagnostic tests and therapy. Pediatrics 96:211-215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Corvaglia, L., P. Bontems, J. M. Devaster, P. Heimann, Y. Glupczynski, E. Keppens, and S. Cadranel. 1999. Accuracy of serology and 13C-urea breath test for detection of Helicobacter pylori in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 18:976-979.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. De Pascalis, R., M. Del Pezzo, G. Nardone, G. Budillon, and A. Lavitola. 1999. Performance characteristics of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determining salivary immunoglobulin G response to Helicobacter pylori. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:430-432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Drumm, B., S. Koletzko, and G. Oderda. 2000. Helicobacter pylori infection in children: a consensus statement. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 30:207-213.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Kindermann, A., H. Demmelmair, B. Koletzko, S. Krauss-Etschmann, B. Wiebecke, and S. Koletzko. 2000. Influence of age on 13C-urea breath test results in children. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 30:85-91.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Luzza, F., M. Imeneo, A. Marasco, S. Crotta, E. Ierardi, P. Usai, C. Virgilio, G. Nardone, S. Marchi, G. Sanna, F. Perri, R. M. Zagari, and F. Bazzoli. 2000. Evaluation of a commercial serological kit for detection of salivary immunoglobulin G to Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre study. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 12:1117-1120.[Medline]
  10. Luzza, F., G. Oderda, M. Maletta, M. Imeneo, L. Mesuraca, E. Chioboli, P. Lerro, S. Guandalini, and F. Pallone. 1997. Salivary immunoglobulin G assay to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection in children. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3358-3360.[Abstract]
  11. Luzza, F., M. Maletta, M. Imeneo, P. Doldo, R. Marasco, L. Biancone, and F. Pallone. 1995. Salivary specific IgG is a sensitive indicator of the humoral immune response to Helicobacter pylori. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 10:281-284.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Malaty, H. M., N. D. Logan, D. Y. Graham, J. E. Ramchatesingh, and S. G. Reddy. 2000. Helicobacter pylori infection in asymptomatic children: comparison of diagnostic tests. Helicobacter 5:155-159.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Marchildon, P., D. H. Balaban, M. Sue, C. Charles, R. Doobay, N. Passaretti, J. Peacock, B. J. Marshall, and D. A. Peura. 1999. Usefulness of serological IgG antibody determinations for confirming eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 94:2105-2108.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Marchildon, P., L. M. Ciota, F. Z. Zamaniyan, J. Peacock, and D. Y. Graham. 1996. Evaluation of three commercial enzyme immunoassays compared with the 13C-urea breath test for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1147-1152.[Abstract]
  15. Marshall, B., A. J. Howat, and P. A. Wright. 1999. Oral fluid antibody detection in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. J. Med. Microbiol. 48:1043-1046.[Abstract]
  16. Oderda, G., A. Rapa, B. Ronchi, P. Lerro, M. Pastore, A. Staiano, G. L. de'Angelis, and P. Strisciuglio. 2000. Detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens by non-invasive antigen enzyme immunoassay in children: multicentre Italian study. Br. Med. J. 320:347-348.[Free Full Text]
  17. Oderda, G., A. Rapa, D. Marinello, B. Ronchi, and A. Zavallone. 2001. Usefulness of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test to monitor response to eradication treatment in children. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 15:203-206.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Raymond, J., N. Kalach, M. Bergeret, J. P. Barbet, P. H. Benhamou, D. Gendrel, and C. Dupont. 1996. Evaluation of a serological test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15:415-417.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Reilly, T. G., V. Poxon, D. S. A. Sanders, T. S. J. Elliott, and R. P. Walt. 1997. Comparison of serum, salivary, and rapid whole blood diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori and their validation against endoscopy based tests. Gut 40:454-458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rothenbacher, D., G. Bode, G. Berg, R. Gommel, T. Gonser, G. Adler, and H. Brenner. 1998. Prevalence and determinants of Helicobacter pylori infection in preschool children--a population based study from Germany. Int. J. Epidemiol. 27:135-141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Rothenbacher, D., G. Bode, and H. Brenner. 2000. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection with a novel stool antigen-based assay in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 19:364-366.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Shepherd, A. J., C. L. Williams, C. P. Doherty, M. Hossack, T. Preston, K. E. L. McColl, and L. T. Weaver. 2000. Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori antigens in the faeces with the urea breath test. Arch. Dis. Child. 83:268-270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Simor, A. E., E. Lin, F. Saibil, L. Cohen, M. Louie, S. Pearen, and H. A. Donhoffer. 1996. Evaluation of enzyme immunoassay for detection of salivary antibody to Helicobacter pylori. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:550-553.[Abstract]
  24. Sunnerstam, B., T. Kjerstadius, L. Jansson, J. Giesecke, M. Bergström, and J. Ejderhamn. 1999. Detection of Helicobacter pylori antibodies in a pediatric population: comparison of three commercially available serological tests and one in-house enzyme immunoassay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3328-3331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Vincent, P., L. Michaud, E. M. de Lasalle, B. Benon, D. Turck, and F. Gottrand. 1999. 13C-urea breath test and gastric mucosal colonization by Helicobacter pylori in children: quantitative relation and usefulness for diagnosis of infection. Helicobacter 4:233-237.[CrossRef][Medline]

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 2002, p. 493-495, Vol. 9, No. 2
1071-412X/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.9.2.493-495.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bode, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rothenbacher, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bode, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rothenbacher, D.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS