Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 2001, p. 388-396, Vol. 8, No. 2
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.2.388-396.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Antibody Responses to MAP 1B and Other Cowdria
ruminantium Antigens Are Down Regulated in Cattle Challenged
with Tick-Transmitted Heartwater
S. M.
Semu,1
T. F.
Peter,1
D.
Mukwedeya,2
A. F.
Barbet,4
F.
Jongejan,3 and
S.
M.
Mahan1,*
University of Florida/USAID/SADC Heartwater
Research Project Causeway,1 and Faculty
of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zimbabwe, Mount
Pleasant,2 Harare, Zimbabwe; Department
of Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht
University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands3;
and Department of Pathobiology, University of Florida,
Gainesville, Florida 32611-08804
Received 21 July 2000/Returned for modification 23 October
2000/Accepted 12 December 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Serological diagnosis of heartwater or Cowdria
ruminantium infection has been hampered by severe cross-reactions
with antibody responses to related ehrlichial agents. A MAP 1B indirect
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay that has an improved specificity and
sensitivity for detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies has been
developed to overcome this constraint (A. H. M. van Vliet,
B. A. M. Van der Zeijst, E. Camus, S. M. Mahan, D. Martinez, and F. Jongejan, J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2405-2410,
1995). When sera were tested from cattle in areas of endemic heartwater
infection in Zimbabwe, only 33% of the samples tested
positive in this assay despite a high infection pressure
(S. M. Mahan, S. M. Samu, T. F. Peter, and F. Jongejan, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci 849:85-87, 1998). To
determine underlying causes for this observation, the kinetics of MAP
1B-specific IgG antibodies in cattle after tick-transmitted C. ruminantium infection and following recovery were investigated.
Sera collected weekly over a period of 52 weeks from 37 cattle, which
were naturally or experimentally infected with C. ruminantium via Amblyomma hebraeum ticks, were
analyzed. MAP 1B-specific IgG antibody responses developed with
similar kinetics in both field- and laboratory-infected cattle. IgG
levels peaked at 4 to 9 weeks after tick infestation and declined to baseline levels between 14 and 33 weeks, despite repeated exposure to infected ticks and the establishment of a carrier state as demonstrated by PCR and xenodiagnosis. Some of the serum samples from
laboratory, and field-infected cattle were also analyzed by
immunoblotting and an indirect fluorescent-antibody test (IFAT) to
determine whether this observed seroreversion was specific to the MAP
1B antigen. Reciprocal IFAT and immunoblot MAP 1-specific antibody
titres peaked at 5 to 9 weeks after tick infestation but also declined
between 30 and 45 weeks. This suggests that MAP 1B-specific IgG
antibody responses and antibody responses to other C. ruminantium antigens are down regulated in cattle despite
repeated exposure to C. ruminantium via ticks.
Significantly, serological responses to the MAP 1B antigen may not be a
reliable indicator of C. ruminantium exposure in cattle in
areas of endemic heartwater infection.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The rickettsia Cowdria
ruminantium is the causative agent of heartwater, an acute, fatal
infectious disease of domestic and wild ruminants (5, 40)
which is transmitted by ticks of the genus Amblyomma
(45). Efforts to study the epidemiology of heartwater and
to implement disease control have been hampered by the lack of reliable
serodiagnostic tests. Available tests are based on cultured organisms
or antigen extracts (7, 9, 13, 15, 23, 26, 34, 36) and on
the major antigenic protein of C. ruminantium, MAP 1 (2), which has been targeted as a diagnostic antigen
because of its immunodominance (2, 11, 14). These tests
are, however, limited by the extensive antigenic similarity between
C. ruminantium and closely related agents of the genus Ehrlichia (1, 8, 12, 14, 17, 35, 41), some of which also infect ruminants. Recently, a partial fragment of MAP 1, MAP
1B, which spans amino acids 47 to 92 of the mature protein (42,
43), has been shown to have high specificity for C. ruminantium in an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA) (24, 25, 43). The assay does not detect antibodies
to ehrlichial agents infecting domestic ruminants, such as
E. bovis, E. ovina, and E. phagocytophila. It does detect antibodies to E. canis (which infects dogs) and antibodies to E. chaffeensis (a pathogen of humans). In the United States,
E. chaffeensis infects white-tailed deer (6,
16), a species that is highly susceptible to heartwater. In
areas of Zimbabwe (22, 43) and the Caribbean (24,
25) that are designated heartwater free by the absence of
Amblyomma ticks and clinical heartwater, the MAP 1B indirect
ELISA demonstrated a high specificity with cattle, sheep and goat sera.
This assay is also reliable for the detection of experimental
infections in small ruminants, and it detects antibodies to
geographically diverse C. ruminantium isolates from
different countries (24, 43). Hence, its use has been
proposed for diagnosis and surveillance of heartwater.
In a preliminary serological survey of heartwater in Zimbabwe using the
MAP 1B indirect ELISA, only 33% of cattle sera from areas with endemic
heartwater infection tested positive (22). The low
seroprevalence was unexpected, given the high infection pressure in
these regions and the consequent likely high prevalence of infection
(27). Epidemiological studies conducted on some of these
farms over several years demonstrated a tick infection rate of 10% and
a vector attachment rate of between one and four ticks every 2 days
(31). At this tick attack rate, it was estimated that
cattle were exposed to fresh infections every 5 to 20 days, and it is
assumed that immunity to heartwater is maintained by the repeated
challenge with infected ticks (27). This inference is
supported by the fact that clinical heartwater cases are very rare on
these farms where infection is endemic.
To investigate the reasons for the low seropositivity, a study was
undertaken to examine the immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody kinetics to
the MAP 1B antigen in cattle infected with tick-transmitted C. ruminantium under natural and laboratory conditions.
To determine whether any observed patterns in serological responses
were specific to MAP 1B, serum samples from some of the infected cattle
were also analyzed by an immunoblotting assay and an indirect
fluorescent-antibody test (IFAT) (20, 36) when peak levels
of MAP 1B-specific antibody responses were detected and during periods
when these antibodies declined significantly or were not detectable.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Initiation of C. ruminantium infections in
cattle.
C. ruminantium infections were initiated
in cattle either by natural exposure to field ticks on a
heartwater-endemic farm (Vlakfontain Farm, 18°47'S 30°40'E) in the
highveld of Zimbabwe or under controlled laboratory conditions via
Amblyomma hebraeum tick transmission. Six-month-old Mashona
(Bos indicus × Bos taurus) cattle were obtained from a
heartwater- and Amblyomma-free area of Zimbabwe (29,
30) and were seronegative for C. ruminantium-reactive antibodies by immunoblotting, IFAT, and MAP
1B ELISA. Mashona, an indigenous Zimbabwean cattle breed, was used as
it forms a high proportion of the cattle population in commercial and
communal farm herds in heartwater-endemic regions of Zimbabwe. These
cattle were divided into five groups (groups 1 to 5). Groups 1 and 2 were exposed to natural field infection on Vlakfontain Farm, while laboratory-infected A. hebraeum ticks were fed on group 3, 4, and 5 cattle at different frequencies. All cattle were monitored for
febrile reactions for the first 3 months postinfection. Sequential serum samples were collected every 5 to 7 days from all cattle for
testing by the indirect MAP 1B ELISA, IFAT, and immunoblotting assay.
Field infection of cattle. (i) Group 1.
Ten cattle were
introduced onto Vlakfontain Farm, which has a high infection pressure
as determined in detailed epidemiological studies (27,
31). On this farm, tick control has been minimal for over 10 years and C. ruminantium is transmitted by A. hebraeum ticks. Tick infestation levels in the resident cattle
were high (See Table 1), and high infection rates with C. ruminantium were present in A. hebraeum ticks
(31). Clinical heartwater was rarely observed, and the
farm was considered to be endemically stable for the disease
(27). The experimental cattle were introduced onto this
farm during peak tick season (February) and allowed to become naturally
infested with A. hebraeum ticks. Infestation with other
ticks (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, R. evertsi evertsi, Boophilus decoloratus, and Hyalomma spp.) which occur
naturally on this farm could not be avoided. This also meant that other tick-borne diseases were also transmitted at the same time as heartwater. Tick control was not practiced on the cattle, except at
week 14, when a synthetic pyrethroid pour-on (flumethrin [Bayticol]; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) was used to reduce the tick burden. Due to
high tick infestation and babesiosis, death occurred in 8 of the 10 cattle.
Weekly counts of adults and nymphs of Amblyomma ticks were
done. Full-body examinations for ticks were conducted, with emphasis on
the preferred sites for tick attachment such as the perianal region,
base of the tail, legs, hooves, udder, scrotum, belly, head, and ears.
Serum and whole-blood samples were collected weekly from each animal.
(ii) Group 2.
To repeat the analysis due to losses of cattle
in group 1, seven new Mashona cattle were purchased from the same
heartwater-free areas and vaccinated against anaplasmosis
(Anaplasma marginale infection) and babesiosis
(Babesia bigemina infection) using a bivalent live blood
vaccine 6 weeks prior to translocation onto Vlakfontain Farm. For
anaplasmosis, an A. centrale blood vaccine was used, and for
babesiosis, a B. bigemina vaccine G strain (isolated near
Gayndah, Queensland, Australia) was used. The vaccine was inoculated
intramuscularly. These cattle were introduced onto the farm during the
low tick season (August) to avoid an overwhelming tick challenge and to
prevent the deaths observed in group 1 cattle. The cattle were allowed
to become naturally infested with A. hebraeum ticks and
other ticks. Weekly tick counts of Amblyomma ticks were done
for 52 weeks as described above. The cattle remained on the farm for a
further 56 weeks. Serum and whole-blood samples were collected from
these cattle weekly for 1 year and again at the end of the study during
week 120.
Laboratory infections of cattle (groups 3 to 5).
In contrast
to the field infections described above, infections in cattle were also
initiated in the laboratory for comparison and to control for
transmission of any cross-reacting ehrlichial agents by field ticks.
Laboratory infections were transmitted by the A. hebraeum
ticks from a colony which was established at least 10 years previously.
For this, infected A. hebraeum ticks were produced in the
laboratory as described below.
(i) Production of infected A. hebraeum ticks for
laboratory infection of cattle:
Six C. ruminantium-naive 6-month-old merino sheep were inoculated
intravenously with 2 ml of supernatant from bovine endothelial-cell cultures (3) which were heavily infected with
C. ruminantium (Zimbabwean Plumtree isolate)
(37). The Plumtree isolate was used to initiate infections
in cattle because it has been previously shown to cause a subacute form
of heartwater which does not usually result in death of the affected
cattle. Laboratory-reared, unfed, uninfected A. hebraeum
nymphs (Zimbabwean Sengwe strain) were fed by placing them in bags
attached to the backs of these sheep during the febrile reaction to
allow acquisition of C. ruminantium during the period
of high rickettsemia (21). Engorged nymphs were collected,
incubated at 27°C and 75% relative humidity, and allowed to molt to
the adult stage. The prevalence and intensity of C. ruminantium infection were assessed in 24 adult ticks (12 male and
12 female) from each sheep by using the C. ruminantium-specific pCS20 DNA probe (19, 21, 44,
46). Infection intensity was estimated semiquantitatively by
comparison of probe hybridization signals with those of quantitated
C. ruminantium DNA standards, as described previously
(31). Specimens of ticks from each batch were shown to be
highly infected with C. ruminantium by DNA probe analysis, with infection rates of 88 to 100%. The intensity of detectable infections ranged from 105 to 108
organisms per tick (Fig. 1). The
viability of infection in the ticks was confirmed by transmission of
C. ruminantium from 30 feeding ticks from each batch on
uninfected susceptible sheep. These ticks transmitted acute lethal
heartwater (data not shown). Heartwater was confirmed as a cause of
death in these sheep at postmortem examination by identifying
C. ruminantium colonies in brain crush smears
(32). The adult male and female ticks from the batches of
infected ticks which hybridized with the DNA probe and transmitted
heartwater were utilized for laboratory infection of cattle as
described below.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
DNA from adult A. hebraeum ticks hybridized
with the pCS20 C. ruminantium-specific DNA probe. The
ticks were infected as nymphs by feeding on sheep infected with
C. ruminantium and were then used for laboratory
infections of cattle. DNA from serial dilutions of C. ruminantium organisms (109 to 102 and 100 ng of C. ruminantium DNA) was used for positive control
samples. DNA from uninfected adult A. hebraeum ticks was
used for negative control samples.
|
|
(ii) Laboratory infection of group 3.
C.
ruminantium (Plumtree isolate)-infected adult A. hebraeum ticks (10 males and 5 females) were placed in bags
attached to the dorsum of each of 20 cattle and allowed to feed
continuously. Male ticks were removed forcibly after all female ticks
had engorged and detached (after approximately 30 days). The cattle
were bled for serum collection at 5 day intervals, commencing on day 15 after tick infestation. On day 110 (approximately 16 weeks) after primary tick infestation, the animals were reexposed to C. ruminantium (Plumtree isolate) by feeding 15 infected adult ticks
(10 males and 5 females) as before. Thereafter, sera were collected
from these cattle at 2-week intervals for 8 weeks.
(iii) Laboratory infection of groups 4 and 5.
Groups 4 and
5, containing five cattle each were initially infested with 20 infected
adult A. hebraeum ticks (10 females and 10 males). At 2 weeks (for group 4) and 4 weeks (for group 5) after the primary tick
infestation and at 2-week intervals thereafter, for a total of 52 weeks, a new batch of 10 C. ruminantium-infected adult
ticks (5 females and 5 males) were fed on each of the cattle. The ticks
were allowed to feed continually in order to mimic field exposure to
C. ruminantium under minimal tick control. Sera and whole blood were collected weekly from all cattle.
Confirmation of carrier status of cattle by xenodiagnosis and
PCR.
Xenodiagnostic methods and the pCS20 PCR (28)
assay were used at various stages of the study to demonstrate that the
infected cattle remain carriers of infection. This was important for
correlation with the MAP 1B ELISA results.
(i) Xenodiagnosis.
Demostration of a carrier state in group
3 cattle was done by feeding nymphal ticks at 2-week intervals from
weeks 3 to 12 postinfection. The molted adult ticks from group 3 cattle
were then tested for acquisition of C. ruminantium
infection by using the pCS20 DNA probe and PCR (28).
Demonstration of a carrier state in group 2, 4, and 5 cattle was
attempted by feeding 400 uninfected A. hebraeum nymphs on
four group 2 field-infected cattle and each of the group 4 and 5 laboratory-infected cattle during weeks 116, 49, and 111 after primary
infection, respectively. This period was 12 weeks after the last
exposure to field ticks in group 2 cattle and 4 and 59 weeks after the
last tick feeds of experimentally infected group 4 and 5 cattle,
respectively. Engorged nymphs were collected from all cattle and
allowed to molt into adults as described above; they were then fed on
heartwater-naive sheep which were free of other hemoparasites. The
sheep were monitored for the development of clinical signs of
heartwater (fever, anorexia, nervous system signs resulting in recovery
or death). Brain biopsies were done on sheep that exhibited febrile
reactions on day 3 of the reaction as described previously
(39). In addition, plasma was prepared from the blood of
all clinically reacting sheep on days 2 and 3 of the febrile reaction
for isolation of C. ruminantium in bovine
endothelial-cell culture to demonstrate transmission of heartwater by
feeding ticks (3, 4). A postmortem examination was done on
sheep that died to confirm that death was due to heartwater, and brain
crush smears were prepared and examined for C. ruminantium colonies in endothelial cells of brain capillaries
(32). Any sheep that survived following tick transmission
were challenged intravenously with a predetermined lethal dose of
Plumtree isolate from infected bovine endothelial-cell culture
supernatants, to determine their clinical response to this infection.
Usually, if cattle, goats, or sheep are experimentally or naturally
infected with C. ruminantium, following recovery from
infection (either naturally or after treatment) they become resistant
to rechallenge with the homologous C. ruminantium
isolate and survive the challenge (40). Hence, a lack of
response to challenge would mean that they have been exposed previously
and that they are immune and a clinical response would mean that the
animals are heartwater naive.
(ii) PCR analysis.
Buffy coat cells were collected weekly
from 10 ml of whole uncoagulated blood from all cattle. DNA was
extracted using QIA-DNA extraction kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Then
10 µl of the DNA sample (5% of total) was used as the template in
50-µl PCR assay mixtures. For each animal, the tests were performed
on weeks 0 and 1 to 12 and then monthly through to week 52. The PCR
assay was performed as previously described (28), based on
primers AB 128 (5'-ACTAGTAGAAATTGCACAATCAT-3'), and AB 129 (5'-TGATAACTTGGTGCGGGAAATCCTT-3'), which amplify a 279-bp
fragment from within open reading frame 2 of the 1,306-bp pCS20 DNA
sequence (28). To increase the sensitivity of detection of
C. ruminantium DNA for samples collected from carriers,
DNA from buffy coat cells collected from cattle when antibodies had
declined to base levels were tested by a nested PCR. Primers U24
(5'-TTTCCCTATGATACAGAAGGTAAC-3') and L24
(5'-AAAGCAAGGATTGTGATCTGGACC-3') were used for the first
amplification, followed by AB 128 and AB 129 as the nested primers.
Then 30 µl of each completed PCR mixture was analyzed on 1.5%
agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide, and the gels were viewed
under UV light and photographed. The electrophoresed products were
transferred to nylon membranes (GeneScreen Plus; Du Pont) and
hybridized with pCS 20 DNA probe, random-primer labeled (Boehringer
Mannheim) with [32P]dCTP (Amersham, Little Chalfont,
United kingdom) as a probe (46). The hybridized blots were
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak Biomax) for 24 to 48 h to determine
the results of these analysis.
Immunoassays. (i) Indirect MAP 1B ELISA.
The indirect MAP 1B
ELISA for detection of total IgG responses was performed using a
recombinant MAP 1B protein of the Senegal isolate of C. ruminantium as described previously (43). The partial
fragment of the mature MAP 1 protein containing amino acids 47 to 152 was expressed in Escherichia coli as a fusion protein in
expression vector pQE9 and purified with
Ni2+-nitrolotriacetic acid agarose under denaturing
conditions as described previously (43). For the
development and validation of the test, the MAP 1B antigen was used as
coating antigen at a concentration of 0.5 µg/ml in 0.5 M carbonate
buffer (43). However, in initial trials of validating the
test for use in Zimbabwe, it was found that an antigen concentration of
2 µg/ml reduced background noise and improved specificity (data not
shown). The test was adapted and optimized to detect the various IgG
isotypes in cattle sera. Anti-bovine IgG (H+L) conjugated to
horseradish peroxidase was obtained from Kirkegaard and Perry
Laboratories (Gaithersburg, Md.), and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
anti-bovine IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies were kindly donated by J. Katende
of the International Livestock Research Institute (Nairobi, Kenya). Optical densities of the completed ELISAs were measured with a Titertek
Multiskan ELISA reader (Titertek, Flow Laboratories Inc.) using dual
wavelengths, 405 and 492 nm. Each serum sample was tested in duplicate,
and duplicate samples of negative and positive control serum samples
were included on each plate. The negative control serum was from
noninfected control animals, while the positive serum was from
experimentally infected cattle. For each plate, the cutoff value was
calculated as two times the percent positivity of the negative control
serum relative to the positive control serum (43). The
cutoff points for the various MAP 1B ELISA averaged at 15.6 ± 4.4%.
(ii) Immunoblotting and IFAT analysis.
To determine whether
patterns in serological reactivity observed against MAP 1B antigen were
also displayed against native MAP 1 antigen and other C. ruminantium antigens, selected sera from the laboratory and
field-infected cattle were also tested by the immunoblot assay and
IFAT. The sera were selected on the basis of their reaction with MAP 1B
antigen and represented peak periods of antibody responses (week 9) and
periods when MAP 1B-specific antibodies were declining (week 30) and
when seronegativity was detected (week 45). A protein G-based
immunoblotting assay, optimized for detection of total IgG antibodies,
was performed as described previously (20). Briefly,
C. ruminantium organisms (Plumtree isolate) were
harvested from supernatants of infected bovine endothelial cells. Host
cell debris was removed by low-speed centrifugation (1,000 × g) for 10 min. The organisms were then pelleted by
centrifugation at 30,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C and
given three washes in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The organisms
were then resuspended in 1 ml of PBS, freeze-thawed, and sonicated
three times. The protein concentration was estimated using the assay of
Lowry et al. (18). For sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, 20 µg of antigen was
loaded per lane and separated on 12% polyacrylamide gels. The proteins
were electrotransfered onto nitrocellulose membranes, and the membranes
were blocked with 5% low-fat milk in Tris-buffered saline (0.1 M
Tris-HCl, 0.9% NaCl [pH 8.0]) and then probed with titrated sera
from two field-infected cattle (group 2) and two laboratory-infected
cattle (group 5). The sera were titrated, at 10-fold dilutions, to the
end point based on the reaction to the immunodominat MAP 1 antigen.
The IFAT, based on cell-cultured C. ruminantium whole
organisms and detected total IgG antibodies to C. ruminantium, was used as described previously (36).
The organisms were harvested from infected bovine endothelial-cell
cultures (Plumtree isolate) which were showing maximum cytopathic
effects. Following removal of cell debris (400 × g for
10 min), the organisms were washed in PBS at 30 000 × g for 30 min at 4°C and resuspended in PBS. Antigen slides were
prepared from suspensions containing Cowdria organims or
uninfected cells and fixed in acetone at
20°C overnight as described previously (36). For IFAT analysis, weekly serum
samples from 10 field-infected cattle (group 1) as well as from 5 laboratory-infected cattle (group 5) were analyzed at doubling
dilutions until peak titers were detected. Thereafter, sera collected
at 5-week intervals from the five laboratory-infected cattle and the
surviving field-infected cattle were titrated to the end point. A
cutoff reciprocal titer of 40 (2 × 1:20, the background titer)
was decided after testing preinfection samples from each animal.
 |
RESULTS |
Clinical responses of cattle to field and laboratory tick
challenge.
Eight cattle in group 1 exhibited mild clinical signs
of heartwater with low-grade fever between weeks 3 and 5 after exposure in the field, but two of the cattle remained unreactive in response to
field tick challenge. In this group, four of the cattle died at week 6, one died at week 9, and three died at week 14 of anemia caused by
babesiosis and a massive tick infestation by A. hebraeum and
other tick species (data not shown). Tick control was not practiced on
the cattle, except at week 14, when a synthetic pyrethroid pour-on
(flumethrin) was used once to reduce the tick burden after eight of the
cattle succumbed to anemia due to high tick burdens. One animal died at
week 36 from non-tick-related causes. The tenth animal survived the
period of study of 52 weeks.
In group 2, four out of the seven cattle exhibited mild febrile
reactions of 39.5 to 40.5°C after 10 to 12 weeks in the field. The
other three remained nonreactive. Tick counts recorded weekly indicate that A. hebraeum adult males, females, and nymphs
infested these cattle throughout the 52 weeks of study (Table
1). Ambylomma tick infestation
levels on cattle increased over the first 10 weeks following their
introduction to the field, but thereafter their levels fluctuated. No
deaths occurred in this group of cattle during the 52 weeks of study.
These cattle remained on the farm for a further 56 weeks after the end
of the 52-week study. During this period, three of the cattle died from
non-heartwater-related conditions.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Periodic counts of A. hebreaum tick
infestation on group 2 cattle introduced onto a heartwater-endemic farm
|
|
In laboratory containment, A. hebraeum ticks transmitted
C. ruminantium to all cattle in group 3, 4, and 5, which resulted in a mild form of clinical heartwater. This was
consistent with the susceptibility of this breed of cattle and with the
virulence of the Plumtree isolate. Of the 10 laboratory-infected
cattle, 4 exhibited mild febrile reactions of 39.5 to 40.2°C between
weeks 3 and 4 and 2 exhibited the reactions between weeks 8 and 9. The remaining cattle did not show any febrile reactions. No deaths were
recorded in these three groups.
Cattle persistently challenged with C. ruminantium
become seronegative to MAP 1B antigen. (i) Field-infected
cattle.
MAP 1B-specific IgG antibodies were first detected
at weeks 3 to 4 in all cattle after exposure to field ticks, except for one animal in group 2, which became positive during week 6. Peak IgG
levels were attained at weeks 4 to 9 in both groups 1 and 2 (Table
2). In four group 1 cattle that survived
for at least 14 weeks, antibodies had declined to baseline levels by
weeks 10 to 12 after exposure to field ticks (Fig.
2a). This decline to baseline levels
occured despite high levels of A. hebraeum tick challenge
and hence C. ruminantium exposure (31).
The antibodies in the fifth animal (which exhibited the highest levels
of IgG antibodies) showed a slower decline and had not reached baseline by 14 weeks (Fig. 2a).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Kinetics of total IgG antibodies detected by MAP 1B
indirect ELISA in cattle exposed to C. ruminantium by
field- or laboratory-infected A. hebraeum ticks. (a and b)
Group 1 and 2 cattle, respectively, naturally infected on a
heartwater-endemic farm; (c) cattle experimentally infected by repeated
infestation with laboratory-infected A. hebraeum ticks.
|
|
In five of the seven cattle in group 2, MAP 1B-specific IgG antibodies
remained detectable for 19 to 31 weeks (Fig. 2b), and in two of the
cattle they were detectable for 38 to 48 weeks (data not shown). In two
of the seven cattle in group 2 which had become seronegative by weeks
22 and 25, a second peak of MAP 1B-specific IgG antibodies was detected
between weeks 38 and 42, but these cattle became seronegative between
weeks 43 and 52. Generally, the antibody decline was slower in group 2 cattle than in group 1 cattle. These cattle remained on the farm for a
further 56 weeks after the end of the 52-week study. During this
period, three of the cattle died from non-heartwater-related
conditions. The four remaining cattle tested at the end of this period
(week 108 after field exposure) were still seronegative for IgG
antibodies by the MAP 1B ELISA (data not shown).
IgG1 antibodies were detected in these cattle with similar kinetics to
those of total IgG (data not shown), but IgG2 antibodies to MAP 1B
antigen were never detected.
(ii) Laboratory-infected cattle.
The patterns of MAP
1B-specific IgG antibody responses in all laboratory-infected cattle
were similar to each other and to the responses of field-infected
cattle, irrespective of the regimen of exposure to infected ticks. A
sample of these responses is shown in Fig. 2c. IgG antibodies were
first detected in all cattle at 3 to 5 weeks after exposure to ticks
and reached peak levels at weeks 4 to 9 (Table 2). However, regardless
of the tick infestation regimen, the antibody levels declined to
baseline, with IgG1 levels reaching baseline quicker (by 14 to 24 weeks) than total IgG levels (by 18 to 28 weeks) (Fig. 2c; Table 2).
One of the group 5 cattle showed a second peak of MAP 1B-specific IgG
antibodies between weeks 26 and 30, after having tested seronegative
from week 16. MAP 1B-specific IgG2 antibodies were not detected.
MAP 1B-seronegative cattle remain carriers of C. ruminantium infection.
C. ruminantium
infection was consistently detected in all surviving field-infected and
laboratory-infected cattle by PCR during weeks 3 to 20 postinfection,
the period during and beyond recovery from primary infection.
Thereafter, detection became inconsistent, and cattle in the various
groups were intermittently positive by PCR. In group 1, in the two
animals that survived longer than 14 weeks, C. ruminantium could be detected from weeks 20 to 36 in one and at
weeks 26 to 28 and 32 in the other (Table 3). In three of the seven
cattle in group 2, C. ruminantium was detectable in
different animals at weeks 24, 32, and 40 (Table
3). In groups 4 and 5, C. ruminantium was detectable in 5 of the 10 cattle at various
intervals between weeks 32 and 52 (Table 3). Group 3 cattle were not
tested by PCR.
Adult ticks fed as nymphs on two of the group 2 field-infected cattle
transmitted C. ruminantium to a heartwater-naive sheep. The sheep developed a febrile reaction, was brain biopsy positive, and
also was confirmed to have died of heartwater by postmortem observations of brain crush smears, although isolation of C. ruminantium from plasma of this sheep in tissue cultures was not
successful. Ticks fed on the other two cattle did not transmit
heartwater to sheep. These four field-infected cattle were seronegative
by MAP 1B ELISA during the period when xenodiagnosis was
conducted (data not shown).
A carrier state in group 3 cattle was demonstrated by conducting PCR on
ticks fed on these cattle. These cattle infected at least 10% of the
ticks fed on them for up to weeks 11 to 12 postinfection. During this
period, they were positive for MAP 1B antibodies. Adult ticks from one
of five cattle in group 4 (animal 126), fed during week 49 of study,
transmitted C. ruminantium to a heartwater-naive sheep,
which developed a febrile reaction and was positive for heartwater
infections by brain biopsy and by C. ruminantium
isolation in bovine endothelial cell cultures from the plasma prepared
during the febrile reaction. This sheep survived the infection and was protected against challenge with a lethal predetermined dose of Plumtree C. ruminantium tissue culture supernatant. MAP
1B-specific IgG antibodies had not been detectable in this animal
(animal 126) from weeks 23 to 52 postinfection. C. ruminantium was also detected by PCR in buffy coat cells of this
animal at weeks 40 and 44, demonstrating persistent infection (Table
3). Adult ticks that had been fed as nymphs on group 5 cattle 59 weeks
after last infected tick feed did not transmit C. ruminantium to any of the sheep. Collectively, the xenodiagnosis
and PCR analysis demonstrated carrier status in some of these cattle
despite their being MAP 1B negative.
Persistently challenged cattle show down regulation of antibody
responses to all C. ruminantium antigens.
Analysis of sequential serum samples of two field-infected and two
laboratory-infected cattle by immunoblotting exhibited MAP 1 reciprocal
titers of 8,000 to 16,000 by week 9, but the titers had decreased to
100 to 1,000 by weeks 30 to 45 after infection (Fig. 3). In fact,
antibody responses to other C. ruminantium antigens
were detectable only at a 1:100 serum dilution (Fig. 3), demonstrating that antibody responses
to all C. ruminantium antigens were down regulated.

View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Immunoblot reactions of titrated sequential serum
samples from naturally and experimentally infected cattle against
C. ruminantium antigens. Serum dilutions were as
follows: strip 1, = 1:100; strip 2, = 1:1,000; strip 3-1:2,000; strip
4, 1:4,000; strip 5, 1:8,000; strip 6, 1:16,000; strip 7, 1:32,000;
strip 8, 1:64,000. Week 9 sera from experimentally infected cattle 103 and 108 had eight dilutions tested. The rest of the serum bleeds had
only five or six dilutions tested. At week 9 postinfestation,
reciprocal end-point titers of MAP 1 antibody responses for both
naturally and experimentally infected cattle were 8,000 to 16,000, which then decreased to 100 to 1,000 by weeks 30 to 45.
|
|
Analysis of antibody responses in sera from field and
laboratory-infected cattle by IFAT revealed the same pattern of
antibody kinetics as detected by immunoblotting and MAP-1 B ELISA. In
the 10 group 1 field-infected cattle, peak titers were observed in sera
from weeks 5 and 6, and this was followed by a decline to a reciprocal
titers of <80 in four of the surviving five cattle by week 14 (Table
4). In the surviving two cattle, antibody
levels did not decline to baseline levels. Peak titers of 80 to 2,560 were detectable in five laboratory-infected cattle (group 5) during weeks 5 to 10 after tick infestation. This was followed by a decline to
reciprocal titers of 10 to 40 between weeks 10 and 50 (Table 5). IFAT analysis of sera from other
groups was not done.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Antibody titers to C. ruminantium by IFAT
in cattle (group 1) naturally infested with A. hebraeum
ticks on a heartwater-endemic farm
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Previous evaluations of antibody kinetics by the MAP 1B indirect
ELISA and by other serodiagnostic tests for heartwater have utilized
sera from needle infections and in most cases have analyzed sera
collected only during the acute phase of infection and a relatively
short period after recovery. The unnatural and short-term nature of
these studies is likely to have produced misleading results. The MAP 1B
indirect ELISA has been described as a specific serological assay for
detection of exposure to heartwater infections, since it detects fewer
false-positives than other tests do (43). Its use in
epidemiology and surveillance of heartwater is also proposed because it
has a high sensitivity when primary-infection sera are tested. However,
surprisingly, the use of this assay in determining the serological
status of cattle in heartwater-endemic areas of Zimbabwe demonstrated
low seropositivity (22). In the present study, we examined
the persistence of antibodies detected by the MAP 1B indirect ELISA in
both laboratory- and field-infected cattle which were infected and
repeatedly exposed to C. ruminantium via the natural
vector in Zimbabwe. The data demonstrate that this assay is a poor
indicator of C. ruminantium exposure in cattle continually challenged by infected ticks. While cattle developed primary IgG responses to MAP 1B, these responses were not detectable from 14 to 28 weeks after experimental infections and 19 to 31 weeks
after placement in a heartwater-endemic area. Occasionally, however, a
few of the cattle showed short periodic peaks of seropositivity after
testing negative in the MAP 1B ELISA. These cattle generally remained
consistently negative by this ELISA despite frequent rechallenge with
infected ticks and despite the fact that a carrier status was
demonstrated. Detection of heartwater infections by PCR correlated well
with antibodies detectable by MAP 1B ELISA during early infection
(Tables 2 and 3). Later on, the correlation was less predictable.
However, once the cattle tested negative by this MAP 1B ELISA,
C. ruminantium could still be detected in the blood of
some of the cattle by PCR.
These results demonstrate the down regulation of MAP 1B
antigen-specific antibody responses in cattle postrecovery. The
observed MAP 1B seroreversion would explain the low seroprevalence
detected in cattle from heartwater-endemic areas of Zimbabwe
(22), where approximately 33% of sera from
heartwater-endemic cattle were found to be positive by MAP 1B ELISA. In
this study, 29% of group 2 cattle and 20% of group 5 cattle which had
become seronegative showed short periods of seropositivity followed
again by seroreversion, which might explain the low percentage of field
cattle in an endemic setting periodically testing MAP 1B positive. In
one of the group 2 field-infected cattle, this second period of
seropositivity coincided with the period when C. ruminantium was also detectable by PCR (Tables 2 and 3). These
data suggest the possibility of (i) cyclical rickettsemia in carrier
animals, (ii) a situation of new variants being expressed, or (iii)
infection with a divergent C. ruminantium isolate. The
data presented here also demonstrate that the high seronegativity of
these cattle was not due to a lack of recognition of the MAP 1B
antigen, since all laboratory and field-infected cattle produced IgG
antibody responses with similar kinetics following primary infection
with C. ruminantium. The reason for the seroreversion
is unclear. It is possible that antigenic variation of the MAP 1B
region is responsible for this seroreversion. MAP 1 genes of
C. ruminantium isolates from different geographical
areas contained three hypervariable regions whose sequences differ from
each other by 0.6 to 14%, with a predicted protein sequence variation
of 0.8 to 10% (33). The MAP 1B fragment of the mature MAP
1 protein contains the first hypervariable region. In addition, the MAP
1 gene of C. ruminantium is a member of a multigene
family (38). It is possible that during persistent infection, in addition to antigenic variations, other genes of this MAP
1 family are expressed to produce a MAP 1B antigen fragment which does
not have antigenic similarity to the antigen in this assay. Antigenic
variants that emerge during persistent rickettsemia have been found in
cattle infected with A. marginale (10). Similar work has not been done for C. ruminantium, and so it is
not possible with the current available information to determine if
this is also occuring with C. ruminantium persistent
infections. There is also the possibility that some of the cattle clear
the infection. This would explain why we were not able to confirm a
carrier state in some cattle by xenodiagnosis and PCR, although very
low rickettsemia could be another reason for lack of transmision and
negative PCRs.
Serological analysis using MAP 1B ELISA was compared with
immunoblotting and IFAT analysis of the same sera because these assays
would detect responses to the MAP 1 antigen and other C. ruminantium antigens. By immunoblot and IFAT analysis, a similar phenomenon was observed, and antibody levels against MAP 1 and other
C. ruminantium antigens in both laboratory- and
field-infected cattle also declined, albeit at a lower rate. This
observation indicates that down regulation of the production of
antibodies against all C. ruminantium antigens seems to
occur in continually challenged cattle. While more detailed studies are
required on the factors influencing the fate of antibody responses,
these preliminary results suggest that serological analysis based on the currently available tests may be misleading in determining the
prevalence of C. ruminantium exposure in cattle
populations. Direct detection of the infecting agent, such as PCR-based
detection alone or in combination with serology, may provide a more
reliable means of assessing C. ruminantium prevalence
in all susceptible ruminant species that are affected by heartwater. In
addition, the presence of infected tick vectors in areas of
surveillance would be a recommended epidemiological parameter to assess
heartwater prevalence.
This study also casts doubt on the reliable use of one MAP 1B antigen
if antigenic variation of MAP 1B antigens exists, possibly along with
other C. ruminantium antigens for the serodiagnosis of
heartwater in recovered cattle. Further study is needed to determine
whether the phenomenon of generalized down regulation of antibody
responses to C. ruminantium in cattle also occurs in
other ruminant species such as sheep and goats. Preliminary evaluation
of goat populations in the same areas of Zimbabwe (where cattle exhibit
a high seronegativity) indicates a high seropositivity by the indirect
MAP 1B ELISA. Therefore, the phenomenon of seroreversion may
be unique to continually challenged cattle. The results of this study highlight the need to critically assess the use and value of
serodiagnostic assays for epidemiological studies of heartwater. Tests
may be applied without adequate knowledge of their expected
performance, and the results may be used to make erroneous decisions
concerning disease management.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This study was supported by U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID) grant LAG-1328-G-00-3030-00 awarded to the
University of Florida.
We thank Boetie O'Neil and Hendrik O'Neil of Vlakfontain Estates,
Zimbabwe, for allowing us to conduct field studies on their farm.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: University
of Florida/USAID/SADC Heartwater Research Project, Box CY
551, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe. Phone: 263-4-705885. Fax:
263-4-794980. E-mail: sumanmah{at}samara.co.zw.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Barbet, A.,
N. Tebele,
S. Semu,
T. Peter,
L. Wassink, and S. Mahan.
1993.
Serological diagnosis of heartwater in Zimbabwe. Problems and perspectives.
Rev. Elev. Med. Vet. Pays Trop.
46:121.
|
| 2.
|
Barbet, A. F.,
S. M. Semu,
N. Chigagure,
P. J. Kelly,
F. Jongejan, and S. M. Mahan.
1994.
Size variation of the major immunodominant protein of Cowdria ruminantium.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
1:744-746[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Byrom, B., and C. E. Yunker.
1990.
Improved culture conditions for Cowdria ruminantium (Rickettsiales), the agent of heartwater disease of domestic ruminants.
Cytotechnology
4:285-290[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Byrom, B.,
C. E. Yunker,
P. L. Donovan, and G. E. Smith.
1991.
In vitro isolation of Cowdria ruminantium from plasma of infected ruminants.
Vet. Microbiol.
26:263-68[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Camus, E.,
N. Barre,
D. Martinez, and G. Uilenberg.
1996.
Heartwater (Cowdriosis). A review, 2nd ed.
Office International des Epizooties, Paris, France.
|
| 6.
|
Dawson, J. E.,
D. E. Stallknecht,
E. W. Howerth,
C. K. Warner,
K. Biggie,
W. R. Davidson,
J. M. Lockhart,
V. F. Nettles,
J. G. Olson, and J. E. Childs.
1994.
Susceptibility of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to infection with Ehrlichia chaffeensis, the etiologic agent of human ehrlichiosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2725-2728[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Du Plessis, J. L.
1981.
Application of the indirect fluorescent antibody test to the serology of heartwater, p. 47-52.
In
G. B. Whitehead, and J. D. Gibson (ed.), Tick biology and control. Tick Research Unit, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.
|
| 8.
|
Du Plessis, J. L.,
E. Camus,
P. T. Oberem, and L. Malan.
1987b.
Heartwater serology. Some problems with interpretation of results.
Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.
54:327-329[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Du Plessis, J. L.,
J. D. Bezuidenhout,
M. S. Brett,
E. Camus,
F. Jongejan,
S. M. Mahan, and D. Martinez.
1993.
Serodiagnosis of heartwater: a comparison of five tests.
Rev. Elev. Med. Vet. Pays Trop.
46:123-129[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
French, D. M.,
W. C. Brown, and G. H. Palmer.
1999.
Emergence of Anaplasma marginale antigenic variants during persistent rickettsemia.
Infect. Immun.
67:5834-5840[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Jongejan, F., and M. J. C. Thielemans.
1989.
Identification of an immunodominant, antigenically conserved 32-kilodalton protein from Cowdria ruminantium.
Infect. Immun.
57:3243-3246[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Jongejan, F.,
L. A. Wassink,
M. J. C. Thielemans,
N. M. Perie, and G. Uilenberg.
1989.
Serotypes in Cowdria ruminantium and their relationship with Ehrlichia phagocytophila determined by immunofluorescence.
Vet. Microbiol.
21:31-40[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Jongejan, F. M.,
C. J. Thielemans,
M. De Groot,
P. J. S. van Kooten, and B. A. M. van der Zeijst.
1991.
Competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for heartwater disease using monoclonal antibodies to a Cowdria ruminantium-specific 32-kilodalton protein.
Vet. Microbiol.
28:199-211[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Jongejan, F.,
N. de Vries,
J. Nieuwenhuijs,
A. H. M. van Vliet, and L. A. Wassink.
1993.
The immunodominant 32-kilodalton protein of Cowdria ruminantium is conserved within the genus Ehrlichia.
Rev. Elev. Med. Vet. Pays Trop.
46:145-152[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Katz, J. B.,
R. DeWald,
J. E. Dawson,
E. Camus,
D. Martinez, and R. Mondry.
1997.
Development and evaluation of a recombinant antigen, monoclonal antibody-based competitive ELISA for heartwater serodiagnosis.
J. Vet. Diagn Investig.
9:130-135[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Katz, J. B.,
A. F. Barbet,
S. M. Mahan,
D. Kumbula,
J. M. Lockhart,
M. K. Keel,
J. E. Dawson,
J. G. Olson, and S. A. Ewing.
1996.
A recombinant antigen from the heartwater agent (Cowdria ruminantium) reactive with antibodies in some southeastern United States white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), but not cattle sera.
J. Wildl. Dis.
32:424-430[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Logan, L. L.,
C. J. Holland,
C. A. Mebus, and M. Ristic.
1986.
Serological relationship between Cowdria ruminantium and certain Ehrlichia species.
Vet. Rec.
119:458-459[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Lowry, O. H.,
N. J. Rosebrough,
A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall.
1951.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J. Biol Chem.
193:265-275[Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Mahan, S. M.,
S. D. Waghela,
T. C. McGuire,
F. R. Rurangirwa,
L. A. Wassink, and A. F. Barbet.
1992.
A cloned DNA probe for Cowdria ruminantium hybridizes with eight heartwater strains and detects infected sheep.
J. Clin Microbiol.
30:981-986[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Mahan, S. M.,
N. Tebele,
D. Mukwedeya,
S. Semu,
C. B. Nyathi,
L. A. Wassink,
P. J. Kelly,
T. Peter, and A. F. Barbet.
1993.
An immunoblotting assay for heartwater based on the immunodominant 32-kilodalton protein of Cowdria ruminantium detects false positives in field sera.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:2729-2737[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Mahan, S. M.,
T. F. Peter,
S. M. Semu,
B. H. Simbi,
R. A. I. Norval, and A. F. Barbet.
1995.
Laboratory reared Amblyomma hebraeum and Amblyomma variegatum ticks differ in their susceptibility to infection with Cowdria ruminantium.
Epidemiol. Infect.
115:345-353[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Mahan, S. M.,
S. M. Semu,
T. F. Peter, and F. Jongejan.
1998.
Evaluation of the MAP-1B ELISA for Cowdriosis with field sera from livestock in Zimbabwe.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
849:85-87[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Martinez, D.,
S. Coisne,
C. Sheikboudou, and F. Jongejan.
1993.
Detection of antibodies to Cowdria ruminantium in the serum of domestic ruminants by indirect ELISA.
Rev. Elev. Med. Vet. Pays Trop.
46:115-120[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Mboloi, M. M.,
C. P. J. Bekker,
C. Kruitwagen,
M. Greiner, and F. Jongejan.
1999.
Validation of the indirect MAP1-B enzyme-linked immunosorbent asssay for diagnosis of experimental Cowdria ruminantium infection in small ruminants.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
6:66-72[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Mondry, R.,
D. Martinez,
E. Camus,
A. Liebisch,
J. B. Katz,
R. Dewald,
A. H. M. van Vliet, and F. Jongejan.
1998.
Validation and comparison of three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of antibodies to Cowdria ruminantium infection.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
849:262-272[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Neitz, A. W. H.,
G. J. Viljoen,
J. D. Bezuidenhout,
P. T. Oberem,
W. Van Wyngardt, and N. M. J. Vermeulen.
1986.
The detection of antibodies to Cowdria ruminantium in serum and C. ruminantium antigen in Amblyomma hebraeum by means of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.
53:39-41[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
O'Callaghan, C. J.,
G. F. Medley,
T. F. Peter, and B. D. Perry.
1998.
Investigating the epidemiology of heartwater (Cowdria ruminantium infection) by means of a transmission dynamics model.
Parasitology
117:49-61.
|
| 28.
|
Peter, T. F.,
S. L. Deem,
A. F. Barbet,
R. Andrew,
I. Norval,
B. H. Simbi,
P. J. Kelly, and S. M. Mahan.
1995.
Development and evaluation of PCR assay for detection of low levels of Cowdria ruminantium infection in Amblyomma ticks not detected by DNA probe.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:166-172[Abstract].
|
| 29.
|
Peter, T. F.,
B. D. Perry,
C. J. O'Callaghan,
G. F. Medley,
W. Shumba,
W. Madzima,
M. J. Burridge, and S. M. Mahan.
1998.
The distribution of heartwater in the highveld of Zimbabwe, 1980-1997.
Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.
65:177-187[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Peter, T. F.,
B. D. Perry,
C. J. O'Callaghan,
G. F. Medley,
W. Shumba,
W. Madzima,
M. J. Burridge, and S. M. Mahan.
1998.
Distribution of the vectors of heartwater Amblyomma hebraeum and Amblyomm variegatum (Acari: Ixodidae) in Zimbabwe.
Exp. Appl. Acarol.
22:725-740[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Peter, T. F.,
B. D. Perry,
C. J. O'Callaghan,
G. F. Medley,
G. Mlambo,
A. F. Barbet, and S. M. Mahan.
1999.
Prevalence of Cowdria ruminantium infection in Ambyomma hebraeum ticks from heartwater-endemic areas of Zimbabwe.
Epidemiol. Infect.
123:309-316[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Purchase, H. S.
1945.
A simple and rapid method for demonstrating Rickettsia ruminantium (Cowdry, 1925) in heartwater brains.
Vet. Rec.
57:413-414.
|
| 33.
|
Reddy, G. R.,
C. R. Sulsona,
R. H. Harrison,
S. M. Mahan,
M. J. Burridge, and A. F. Barbet.
1996.
Sequence heterogeneity of the major antigenic protein 1 genes from C. ruminantium isolates from different geographical areas.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Microbiol.
3:417-422.
|
| 34.
|
Sahu, S. P.
1986.
Fluorescent antibody technique to detect Cowdria ruminantium in vitro cultured macrophages and buffy coats from cattle, sheep and goats.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
47:1253-1257[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Savadye, D. T.,
P. J. Kelly, and S. M. Mahan.
1994.
Evidence to show that an agent that cross-reacts serologically with Cowdria ruminantium in Zimbabwe is transmitted by ticks.
Exp. Appl. Acarol.
22:111-122.
|
| 36.
|
Semu, S. M.,
S. M. Mahan,
C. E. Yunker, and M. J. Burridge.
1992.
Development and persistence of Cowdria ruminantium-specific antibodies following experimental infection of cattle, as determined by the indirect fluorescent antibody test.
Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.
33:339-352[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Smith, G. E.,
E. C. Anderson,
M. J. Burridge,
T. F. Peter, and S. M. Mahan.
1998.
Growth of Cowdria ruminantium in tissue culture endothelial cell lines from wild African mammals.
J. Wildl. Dis.
34:297-304[Abstract].
|
| 38.
|
Sulsona, C. R.,
S. M. Mahan, and A. F. Barbet.
1999.
The map 1 gene of Cowdria ruminantium is a member of a multigene family containing both conserved and variable genes.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
257:300-305[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Synge, B. A.
1978.
Brain biopsy for the diagnosis of heartwater.
Trop. Anim. Health Prod.
10:45-48[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Uilenberg, G.
1983.
Heartwater (Cowdria ruminantium infection): current status.
Adv. Vet. Sci. Comp. Med.
27:427-480[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
van Vliet, A. H. M.,
F. Jongejan, and B. A. M. Van der Zeijst.
1992.
Phylogenetic position of Cowdria ruminantium (Rickettsiales) determined by analysis of amplified 16S ribosomal DNA sequences.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
42:494-498[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
van Vliet, A. H. M.,
F. Jongejan,
M. van Kleef, and B. A. M. van der Zeijst.
1994.
Molecular cloning, sequence analysis, and expression of the gene encoding the immunodominant 32-kilodalton protein of Cowdria ruminantium.
Infect. Immun.
62:1451-1456[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
van Vliet, A. H. M.,
B. A. M. Van der Zeijst,
E. Camus,
S. M. Mahan,
D. Martinez, and F. Jongejan.
1995.
Use of a specific immunogenic region on the Cowdria ruminantium MAP1 protein in a serological assay.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:2405-2410[Abstract].
|
| 44.
|
Waghela, S. D.,
F. R. Rurangirwa,
S. M. Mahan,
C. E. Yunker,
T. B. Crawford,
A. F. Barbet,
M. J. Burridge, and T. C. McGuire.
1991.
A cloned DNA probe identifies Cowdria ruminantium in Amblyomma variegatum ticks.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:2571-2577[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Walker, J. B., and A. Olwage.
1987.
The tick vectors of Cowdria ruminantium (Ixodoidea, Ixodidae, genus Amblyomma) and their distribution.
Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.
54:353-379[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Yunker, C. E.,
S. M. Mahan,
S. D. Waghela,
T. C. McGuire,
F. R. Rurangirwa,
A. F. Barbet, and L. A. Wassink.
1993.
Detection of Cowdria ruminantium by means of a DNA probe, pCS20, in infected bont ticks, Amblyomma hebraeum, the major vector of heartwater in Southern Africa.
Epidemiol. Infect.
110:95-104[Medline].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 2001, p. 388-396, Vol. 8, No. 2
1071-412X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.2.388-396.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sumption, K. J., Paxton, E. A., Bell-Sakyi, L.
(2003). Development of a Polyclonal Competitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection of Antibodies to Ehrlichia ruminantium. CVI
10: 910-916
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bell-Sakyi, L., Koney, E. B. M., Dogbey, O., Sumption, K. J., Walker, A. R., Bath, A., Jongejan, F.
(2003). Detection by Two Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays of Antibodies to Ehrlichia ruminantium in Field Sera Collected from Sheep and Cattle in Ghana. CVI
10: 917-925
[Abstract]
[Full Text]