Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, November 2000, p. 977-979, Vol. 7, No. 6
1071-412X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Rapid Detection of Salmonella enterica Serovar
Choleraesuis in Blood Cultures by a Dot Blot Enzyme-Linked
Immunosorbent Assay
Kritsana
Janyapoon,1
Sunee
Korbsrisate,2,*
Hatairat
Thamapa,1
Sittichai
Thongmin,1
Suwattana
Kanjanahareutai,3
Niramol
Wongpredee,4 and
Suttipant
Sarasombath2
Faculty of Medical Technology, Rangsit
University,1 Departments of
Immunology2 and
Microbiology,4 Faculty of
Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, and Microbiology
Section, Department of Pathology, Rajavithi General
Hospital,3 Bangkok, Thailand
Received 11 February 2000/Returned for modification 3 April
2000/Accepted 3 August 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
A dot blot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a
monoclonal antibody specific to phase1-c Salmonella was
developed for the direct detection of Salmonella enterica
serovar Choleraesuis in blood cultures. This system was applied to the
identification of serovar Choleraesuis, and the results were compared
with those obtained by a conventional biochemical method. It was
revealed that all 12 samples identified to be infected with serovar
Choleraesuis were positive on testing by the ELISA. In contrast, 77 samples infected with bacteria commonly isolated from the blood were
not reactive by the ELISA. The calculated sensitivity and specificity of the established assay are 100%.
 |
TEXT |
The genus Salmonella
consists of gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria that cause salmonellosis
in humans and animals. The disease is one of the most important public
health problems in many countries, including Thailand. The infection is
an important cause of diarrhea and, in some cases, septicemia. In
general, Salmonella septicemia is due to Salmonella
enterica serovar Typhi infection and is called typhoid fever
(8). However, during the past decade, the incidence of
septicemia due to nontyphoidal Salmonella has been
increasing, especially among patients with human immunodeficiency
virus infection (7, 10). The rate of isolation of
Salmonella spp. from cultures of blood from this group of
patients is 11.2%, and among these identifiable
Salmonella spp., the most common isolate is
S. enterica serovar Choleraesuis (P. Komolpis, S. Srifuengfung, C. Dhiraputra, B. Pingwang, T. Wensantia, and P. Siripoonkiat, Program Abstr. Siriraj Sci.
Congr., p. 311, 2000).
Conventional methods for the isolation and identification of
Salmonella in blood cultures are laborious and
time-consuming, and it takes at least 3 days to obtain a result.
Since septicemia requires rapid treatment, a rapid technique for the
detection and identification of this significant blood microorganism is urgently needed. Currently, molecular biology-based techniques including PCR assays and DNA hybridization assays have been reported for the rapid, specific, and sensitive detection of microorganisms in
blood samples (3, 9, 11). However, these methods require sophisticated laboratory equipment which is available in only a few
large diagnostic laboratories. Here we report on the development of a
simple dot blot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the
identification of S. enterica serovar Choleraesuis, a phase1-c Salmonella, directly from hemoculture bottles.
Furthermore, cultures of blood obtained from septicemic patients were
analyzed to evaluate the potential use of the established assay. By
this assay, biochemical identification of pure serovar Choleraesuis cultures can be avoided. The identification can be finished within 1 day instead of the 2 to 3 days required by conventional biochemical identification methods.
MAb and bacterial strains. A monoclonal antibody (MAb)
specific to phase1-c flagellin from Salmonella was developed by Ekpo et al. (4). Hybridomas producing the MAb were
obtained by using the Barber protein of S. enterica serovar
Paratyphi C as the immunogen. According to the ELISA and immunoblot
results, the MAb gave positive reactions with
Salmonella strains that express the phase1-c
flagellin, including strains of serovars Paratyphi C and Choleraesuis,
for a protein with a molecular mass of 61 kDa. There was no
cross-reactivity with Barber proteins of other bacteria known to cause
enteric fever and enteric fever-like illness (i.e., S. enterica serovars Typhi, Paratyphi A, Paratyphi B, Enteritidis, Krefeld, Panama, and Typhimurium; Escherichia coli;
Burkholderia pseudomallei; and Yersinia
enterocolitica). All bacterial strains examined in this study were
obtained from the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine
Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Inoculation of blood culture broth and flagellin extraction.
Five milliliters of blood donated by healthy subjects was added to a
culture bottle containing 45 ml of sterilized Trypticase soy broth
(TSB). This bottle was inoculated with S. enterica serovar Choleraesuis at final concentrations of 1, 10, 102, and
103 cells/ml of blood. The bacterial inoculum had been
prepared by diluting the overnight culture of serovar Choleraesuis with
TSB so that it contained 1.2 × 109 CFU/ml
(corresponding to a no. 4 McFarland standard). Thereafter, further
dilutions were undertaken to obtain the appropriate cell culture
concentration for artificial inoculation into the blood culture. The
inoculated blood culture bottles were then incubated at 37°C for
4 h or 20 h (overnight). To extract flagellin protein after
incubation, 5 ml of broth from each blood culture bottle was
centrifuged at 150 × g for 5 min to separate the red
blood cells. The supernatant was subsequently centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 15 min to collect the bacterial cells. The
bacterial cell pellet was then washed once with 0.85% NaCl before
resuspension in 2 ml of 0.85% NaCl and separation into two tubes for
comparison of two different flagellin extraction methods.
The first flagellin extraction method tested followed that described by
Ibrahim et al. (6), with some modification. Essentially, the
flagellin protein was extracted by exposure of the bacterial cells to 1 N hydrochloric acid at pH 2 for 20 min. The cellular debris was then
separated by centrifugation at 1,500 × g for 15 min
and the flagellin protein in the supernatant was collected. The pH of
this supernatant solution was adjusted to 7.2 with 1 N sodium hydroxide
before the dot blot ELISA was performed. The second flagellin
extraction method tested followed that previously described by Chart et
al. (2). Briefly, the flagellin protein was extracted by
heating the bacterial cell suspension at 60°C for 30 min in a
water bath, followed by centrifugation at 1,500 × g
for 15 min. The supernatant containing the flagellin protein was
collected for the dot blot ELISA.
Detection of serovar Choleraesuis flagellin by dot blot
ELISA. Optimal incubation conditions and reagent concentrations for the dot blot ELISA were predetermined by checkerboard titration. One hundred microliters of flagellin protein extracted from
artificially inoculated blood cultures was applied to a nitrocellulose
membrane with a dot blot apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond,
Calif.). The blotted nitrocellulose strip was subsequently blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.15 M [pH
7.2]) for 20 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS containing 0.02% Tween 20, the strip was incubated with the MAb specific to phase1-c flagellin for 1 h at room temperature. The strip was washed once and was incubated with alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulins (Dakopatt,
Copenhagen, Denmark) at room temperature for 1 h. The substrate,
o-dianisidine tetrazotized (6 mg per ml) and beta-naphthyl
acid phosphate (1 mg per ml) (Sigma Chemical Company, Saint Louis,
Mo.), diluted with substrate buffer (0.05 M carbonate buffer [pH
9.8]), was then added and the reaction was stopped by rinsing the
strip with distilled water. A red-purple dot indicated a positive
reaction, and a pale brown dot indicated a negative one. The same
donated blood sample into which serovar Choleraesuis was not inoculated
was used as a negative control.
Figure 1 shows the sensitivity of the
established assay. Positive reactions were observed when 1, 10, 102, and 103 cells of serovar Choleraesuis were
present in 1 ml of a blood sample. The incubation time required to
obtain such positive results was 4 h (Fig. 1A). At that time, the
viable cell counts before the assay were 1 × 102,
5 × 102, 1 × 103, and 1 × 104 CFU/ml, respectively. These concentrations gave no
turbidity of the culture broth. In addition, when the incubation time
was extended to overnight (20 h), stronger signals were obtained when the viable cell count for each concentration exceeded 108
CFU/ml (Fig. 1B). Comparison of the two flagellin extraction methods
tested revealed that both heat and acid extraction gave the same
sensitivity for serovar Choleraesuis detection (Fig. 1A, lanes I and
II, and Fig. 1B, lanes I and II). However, the heat extraction method
described by Chart et al. (2) was superior because it was
simpler and required less equipment.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Sensitivity of the dot blot ELISA. Serially diluted
S. enterica serovar Choleraesuis was inoculated into blood
cultures until the concentration of serovar Choleraesuis was 1, 10, 102, or 103 cells/ml of blood, followed by
incubation for 4 h (A) or 20 h (B). The number of viable
cells in each sample after 4 h of incubation was 1 × 102, 5 × 102, 1 × 103,
and 1 × 104 CFU/ml, respectively, whereas there were
more than 1 × 108 CFU/ml after 20 h of
incubation. Methods of flagellin extraction with either acid (lanes I)
or heat (lanes II) were compared. Parallel blood samples not inoculated
with serovar Choleraesuis served as negative controls.
|
|
The specificity of the dot blot ELISA was tested by artificially
inoculating bacteria known to cause bacterial septicemia (i.e.,
Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae,
E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, and two other closely related S. enterica serovars, serovars Typhi and Paratyphi C) into culture bottles containing blood from healthy donors. The results showed that
all samples except those containing serovar Paratyphi C gave negative
results (Fig. 2). This finding confirmed
the phase1-c-specific property of the MAb used. The phase1-c
Salmonella strains that have been reported to be causative
agents of septicemia are of serovars Choleraesuis and Paratyphi C only.
Serovar Paratyphi C has not been reported in Thailand over the last 10 years (1). As a result, positive detection by this dot blot
ELISA is highly suggestive of serovar Choleraesuis infection.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Specificity of the dot blot ELISA. Eight bacterial
strains known to cause septicemia were inoculated into hemocultured
broth (10 cells/ml of blood) and incubated for 20 h before the
assay. The number of bacterial cells in each sample before the assay
was more than l08 CFU/ml. Parallel blood samples not
inoculated with S. enterica serovar Choleraesuis served as
negative controls.
|
|
Testing of clinical samples. Identification of
S. enterica serovar Choleraesuis, a phase1-c
Salmonella species, by the established assay was
compared with identification by the conventional biochemical
identification method. Eighty-nine unknown blood culture samples from
the Microbiology Section of the Rajavithi General Hospital were
received for testing by the dot blot ELISA. All these samples showed
turbidity and were randomly selected by the staff in the Microbiology
Section. In brief, 5 ml of each unknown blood culture sample was
centrifuged to separate the red blood cells from the cultured fluid,
and the supernatant was heated to 60°C to extract the flagellin
protein from the bacterial cells, followed by the dot blot ELISA. After
comparison of this result with the result obtained by the conventional
biochemical identification method (done by the Microbiology Section),
it was revealed that all 12 samples identified by the conventional
biochemical identification method to be infected with serovar
Choleraesuis were also positive by the ELISA (Table
1). No false-positive result was observed for blood cultures positive for other gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The calculated sensitivity and specificity (5)
obtained by using the conventional biochemical identification method as the "gold standard" were 100%. In addition, the advantage of the established assay over the conventional biochemical typing method is
that identification of the bacteria, after blood culture, can be
achieved within 3 h, whereas at least 2 days was required to obtain the result by the conventional method.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Identification of S. enterica serovar
Choleraesuis by dot blot ELISA compared with that by the
conventional identification method
|
|
In conclusion, the results of the immunological technique described
here were in very good agreement with those of the conventional biochemical test for the identification of S. enterica
serovar Choleraesuis directly from blood cultures, and the
immunological technique has the advantage of being simple and rapid.
Large numbers of blood culture samples could be dotted onto a membrane
and microorganisms could be detected within a few hours. Therefore, the
technique described here offers the benefit of allowing proper
treatment earlier than the time of treatment allowed as a result of the use of the conventional method. Furthermore, the dot blot ELISA could
be used as a model for the development of methods for the detection of
other microorganisms in blood cultures.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We gratefully thank Charin Thepthai and Suwat Dumnin for
preparation of the MAb and Timothy W. Flegel for reviewing the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand. Phone: 66-2-418-0569. Fax:
66-2-418-1636. E-mail: grsks{at}mahidol.ac.th.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bangtrakulnonth, A.,
P. Tishyadhigama,
O. Ratchatrachenchai, and K. Supawat.
1998.
Annual report of the confirmed enteropathogenic bacteria in Thailand.
National Institute of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
|
| 2.
|
Chart, H.,
B. Rowe, and J. S. Cheesbrough.
1997.
Serological response of patients infected with Salmonella typhi.
J. Clin. Pathol.
50:944-946[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Cocolin, L.,
M. Manzano,
G. Astori,
G. A. Botta,
C. Cantoni, and G. Comi.
1998.
A highly sensitive and fast non-radioactive method for the detection of polymerase chain reaction products from Salmonella serovars, such as Salmonella typhi in blood specimens.
FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.
22:233-239[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Ekpo, P.,
S. Sarasombath,
N. Banchuin,
S. Pongsunk,
S. Korbsrisate, and S. Sirisinha.
1995.
Monoclonal antibodies against protein antigens of salmonellae causing paratyphoid fever and their diagnostic application.
Asian Pac. J. Allergy Immunol.
13:63-70[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Galen, R. S.
1980.
The predictive values and efficiency of laboratory testing.
Pediatr. Clin. N. Am.
27:861-890[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Ibrahim, G. F.,
G. H. Fleet,
M. J. Lyons, and R. A. Walker.
1985.
Method for the isolation of highly purified Salmonella flagellins.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
22:1040-1044[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Levine, W. C.,
J. W. Buebler,
N. H. Bean, and R. V. Tauxe.
1991.
Epidemiology of non-typhoidal Salmonella bacteremia during the human immunodeficiency virus epidemic.
J. Infect. Dis.
164:81-87[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Miller, S. I.,
E. L. Hohmann, and D. A. Pegues.
1995.
Salmonella: including Salmonella typhi, p. 2013-2033.
In
G. L. Mandell, H. E. Bennett, and R. Dolin (ed.), Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone, New York, N.Y.
|
| 9.
|
Rattanathongkom, A.,
R. W. Sermswan, and S. Wongratanacheewin.
1997.
Detection of Burkholderia psuedomallei in blood samples using polymerase chain reaction.
Mol. Cell. Probes
11:25-31[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Yang, C. H.,
H. H. Tseng,
K. J. Chen, and J. D. Liu.
1996.
Salmonella infections: a retrospective 10-year analysis of 134 cases in a regional hospital in Taiwan.
Scand. J. Infect. Dis.
28:171-175[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Zhang, Y.,
D. J. Isaacman,
R. M. Wadowsky,
J. Rydquist-White,
J. C. Post, and G. D. Ehrlich.
1995.
Detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae in whole blood by polymerase chain reaction.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:596-601[Abstract].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, November 2000, p. 977-979, Vol. 7, No. 6
1071-412X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.