Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 1999, p. 756-759, Vol. 6, No. 5
1071-412X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Detection of Antibodies to Brucella
Cytoplasmic Proteins in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with
Neurobrucellosis
Pablo C.
Baldi,1,*
George F.
Araj,2
Graciela C.
Racaro,1
Jorge C.
Wallach,3 and
Carlos
A.
Fossati1
Instituto de Estudios de la Inmunidad Humoral
(IDEHU), 1113 Buenos Aires,1 and
Servicio de Brucelosis, Hospital F. J. Muñiz,
1282 Buenos Aires,3 Argentina, and
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American
University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut,
Lebanon2
Received 6 January 1999/Returned for modification 24 February
1999/Accepted 28 May 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The diagnosis of human neurobrucellosis usually relies on the
detection of antibodies to Brucella lipopolysaccharide
(LPS) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by agglutination tests or
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Here we describe the
detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) to cytoplasmic proteins (CP) of
Brucella spp. by ELISA and Western blotting in seven CSF
samples from five patients with neurobrucellosis. While IgG to CP
(titers of 200 to 12,800) and IgG to LPS (800 to 6,400) were found in
the CSF of these patients, these antibodies were not detected in CSF
samples from two patients who had systemic brucellosis without
neurological involvement. The latter, however, had serum IgG and IgM to
both LPS and CP. No reactivity to these antigens was found in CSF
samples from 14 and 20 patients suffering from nonbrucellar meningitis and noninfectious diseases, respectively. These findings suggest that,
in addition to its usefulness in the serological diagnosis of human
systemic brucellosis, the ELISA with CP antigen can be used for the
specific diagnosis of human neurobrucellosis.
 |
TEXT |
Brucellosis remains a common human
zoonotic disease, especially in developing countries. Neurological
involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) has been detected in 3 to 5% of the patients with brucellosis, in both the presence and
absence of systemic illness (10, 13). Meningitis is the most
frequently encountered clinical condition in patients with
neurobrucellosis, and it occurs after direct invasion of the CNS by
Brucella (7, 10, 13). Acute Brucella
meningitis is usually characterized by sudden onset of fever, headache,
and nuchal rigidity. Psychiatric and motor sensory disorders are also
common. However, since similar symptoms may be present in some patients
who have systemic brucellosis without neurological involvement and in
patients who have infectious meningitis due to other microorganisms,
the diagnosis of neurobrucellosis requires direct or indirect evidence
of Brucella in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (7,
10). Because of the low frequency of Brucella isolation from CSF (less than 20% of patients), the diagnosis of
neurobrucellosis usually depends on the detection of specific antibodies in that fluid (7, 10, 13). Oligoclonal
immunoglobulin G (IgG), indicative of intrathecal antibody production,
is frequently detected in CSF but is not exclusively diagnostic of
neurobrucellosis (7, 11). The finding of brucella-specific
antibodies in the CSF is highly indicative of CNS infection; however,
since these antibodies are sometimes present at low levels,
agglutination tests commonly employed in the diagnosis of
neurobrucellosis can give false-negative results (2, 10,
13). In contrast, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
for detecting antibodies to heat-killed Brucella antigens
showed high sensitivity in the diagnosis of neurobrucellosis (1,
2). These antigens, however, are likely to contain significant
amounts of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and, as indicated by the authors,
cross-reactions with other gram-negative bacteria may occur. We have
previously shown that the detection of serum antibodies to cytoplasmic
proteins (CP [formerly called LPS-free CYT]) of Brucella
spp. is useful for the specific diagnosis of human and animal
brucellosis (4, 5, 9). Here we present results which
indicate that the detection of antibodies to CP in CSF makes possible
the differentiation between patients who have neurobrucellosis and
those who have systemic brucellosis and neurological manifestations
without actual CNS infection.
Two ELISA systems were used. CSF and serum antibodies against
Brucella CP antigens were detected by an indirect ELISA as
described previously (9). The CP antigen is an LPS-depleted
cytoplasmic fraction of Brucella abortus S19, obtained by
immunosorption with an anti-LPS monoclonal antibody. Maxisorp
polystyrene plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were sensitized with 0.5 µg of CP diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) per well. Plates
were blocked with 200 µl of PBS containing 1% skim milk per well.
After a wash, human CSF or sera were dispensed in serial dilutions
(starting at 1:100) in a solution of PBS, 0.3% skim milk, and 0.05%
Tween 20. Specific antibodies were detected with polyclonal anti-human IgG- or anti-human IgM-horseradish peroxidase conjugates (diluted 1:2,000 and 1:1,000, respectively; DAKO, Carpinteria, Calif.) The
reaction was developed by adding ortho-phenylenediamine (2 µg µl
1, in 0.1 M citrate-phosphate buffer containing
0.03% H2O2) and was stopped with 4 N
H2SO4.
CSF and serum antibodies against LPS were detected by capture ELISA
with the anti-LPS monoclonal antibody BC68 as described previously
(9). Purified BC68 was adsorbed onto the well surfaces of
the Maxisorp polystyrene plates, and after blocking, a cytoplasmic fraction of Brucella (9) was added to a final
concentration of 5 µg of LPS per well. The testing of the samples,
addition of the conjugates, and development of the reaction were
performed as described above.
To establish the cutoff value of the assays, 30 serum samples from
healthy subjects and 20 CSF samples from noninfected controls (mostly
Alzheimer's disease patients) were assayed at a 1:100 dilution
(anti-CP antibodies) or 1:200 dilution (anti-LPS antibodies) under the
conditions described above. The cutoff value of each ELISA system was
calculated as the mean specific optical density (OD) plus 3 standard
deviations. The titer was calculated as the reciprocal of the last
serum or CSF dilution giving an OD higher than the cutoff. For the
assays of CSF, the cutoff values were 0.020 for anti-LPS IgM, 0.136 for
anti-LPS IgG, 0.028 for anti-CP IgM, and 0.109 for anti-CP IgG.
These assays were used to test seven CSF samples from five patients who
had neurobrucellosis, as shown by signs and symptoms indicative of
neurological involvement and a positive result for anti-Brucella antibodies in CSF by an agglutination or
Coombs test (3) or the isolation of Brucella from
CSF (Table 1). Four patients were from
Lebanon, and according to the sources of infection (raw cheese or
milk), all of these cases were presumed to have been caused by
Brucella melitensis. The other patient was from Argentina
and had meningitis caused by Brucella suis. In addition, the
ELISAs were used to test CSF and serum samples from two patients who
had brucellosis without neurological involvement. These latter patients
had signs and symptoms typical of brucellosis and showed positive
results in the standard tube agglutination and rose bengal tests. One
of them also had a positive blood culture for B. abortus.
Since both patients had severe headaches, CSF samples were obtained to
rule out infections with neurological involvement. However, both CSF
samples had normal physicochemical parameters and no microorganism was
isolated. In addition, and in order to confirm the specificity of the
test, the ELISAs were used for 20 CSF samples from noninfected controls
and 14 CSF samples from patients who had meningitis caused by
infectious agents other than Brucella (four cases caused by
Staphylococcus aureus, four by Streptococcus
pneumoniae, three by Neisseria meningitidis, two by
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and one by Cryptococcus
neoformans). To further characterize the antibody response to
Brucella proteins, CSF samples were assayed by
immunoblotting against CP. Briefly, the CP antigen was electophoresed
in 15% polyacrylamide gel in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate
and electrotransferred to nitrocellulose sheets by conventional
methods. After blocking with PBS containing 3% skim milk, the sheets
were cut into strips, and each strip was incubated with CSF diluted
1:20 in 1% skim milk containing 0.05% Tween 20. After a subsequent
incubation with peroxidase-conjugated polyclonal antibody to human IgG
(diluted 1:1,000; DAKO), the reaction was developed with
4-chloro-
-naphthol (3 mg/ml) and H2O2
(0.03%) in Tris-buffered saline.
Antibodies to Brucella antigens in CSF and serum.
As shown in Fig. 1, CSF samples from
noninfected controls assayed at a 1:100 dilution produced very low ODs
(below 0.100) in both ELISAs. At the same dilution, in contrast, the
CSF from patients with neurobrucellosis produced ODs of 0.223 to 2.068 for anti-CP IgG and 0.563 to 1.882 for anti-LPS IgG. Since the respective cutoff values were 0.109 and 0.136, these samples were all
considered positive for IgG to CP and IgG to LPS. Anti-LPS IgG titers
from these samples ranged from 800 to 6,400, and anti-CP IgG titers
ranged from 200 to 12,800. Conversely, the CSF from the two patients
who had brucellosis without neurological involvement were negative for
both anti-CP IgG and anti-LPS IgG. Serum samples from these two
patients, however, were positive for IgM to LPS (titers of 25,600 and
1,600), IgM to CP (200 and 100), IgG to LPS (800 in both patients), and
IgG to CP (200 and 400). CSF samples from patients who had brucellosis
with or without neurological involvement were negative for IgM against
both CP and LPS except for patient 4, whose titers were 400 and 800, respectively. In addition, CSF samples from the 14 patients with
infectious nonbrucellar meningitis were negative for IgG to
Brucella CP and LPS (Fig. 1), and the same was true for IgM
antibodies to both antigens (not shown).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
IgG reactivity to Brucella CP and LPS in CSF
samples from noninfected subjects and from patients with
neurobrucellosis, systemic brucellosis without neurological
involvement, or nonbrucellar meningitis. Anti-CP and anti-LPS
reactivities were determined by indirect and antigen capture ELISAs,
respectively.
|
|
As shown in Fig. 2, different patterns of
reactivity to Brucella CP were observed when CSF samples
from patients with neurobrucellosis were assayed by immunoblotting. The
reactivity patterns ranged from a few bands developed by the sample
from patient 1 to about 20 bands developed by the initial sample of
patient 4. All the CSF samples tested reacted with a protein with an
apparent molecular mass of 22 kDa. In addition, a protein of 29 kDa was
recognized by all samples except that from patient 1, and one band of
66 kDa was revealed by five of the seven samples. Notably, the sample from the B. suis-infected patient reacted with proteins of
13, 26, and 42 kDa that were not recognized by the remaining samples, while it did not react with a group of proteins between 17 and 22 kDa
that was recognized by the samples from patients 3 and 4. In addition,
this sample reacted strongly with a protein of 15 kDa that exhibited
only a faint reaction with the remaining samples. The sample from
patient 1, which reacted only with proteins of 22, 15, and 38 kDa
(exhibiting a faint reaction with the last two proteins), was the CSF
sample with the lowest anti-CP titer, as determined by ELISA.

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
IgG reactivity to Brucella CP in CSF samples
from patients with neurobrucellosis as assayed by Western blotting.
Proteins were electrophoresed in 15% polyacrylamide gel in the
presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate, transferred to nitrocellulose, and
reacted to CSF diluted 1:20. Lanes 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7, diagnostic
samples from patients 1 to 5, respectively; lane 4, sample taken from
patient 3 60 days later; lane 6, sample taken from patient 4 30 days
later.
|
|
Since most patients who have systemic brucellosis without neurological
involvement may show signs and symptoms such as headache and
neuropsychiatric complaints (10, 11), the differentiation between this condition and neurobrucellosis is of paramount importance. The results reported here suggest that the detection of IgG antibodies against CP of Brucella in CSF allows this differentiation.
Both antiprotein and anti-LPS antibodies were detected in the CSF
samples from patients with proven neurobrucellosis but not in the CSF samples from patients who had systemic brucellosis without neurological involvement, while serum antibodies to Brucella were present
in all these patients. These results agree with those of Araj et al.
(1, 2), who detected IgG, IgM, and IgA to antigens from heat-killed Brucella in CSF samples from patients with
neurobrucellosis but not in CSF samples from patients who had
brucellosis without neurological involvement. It is interesting that
all these latter patients had specific IgG and IgA in serum, and 77%
of them also had IgM antibodies (2).
The ELISA system used here showed excellent specificity, since
antibodies to Brucella CP were not detected in the 14 CSF
samples from patients who had CNS infection due to microorganisms other than Brucella. Brucella CP have been previously
shown to be specific to that genus and common to all its species
(4-6, 8, 9). The CP antigen prepared from B. abortus has been successfully applied to the diagnosis of
infections caused by the homologous species (5, 6) and also
by B. melitensis (6, 12) and B. canis
(4). Moreover, as shown here and in previous studies (6), it is also useful in diagnosing infections caused by
B. suis.
Although the incidence of neurological involvement in cases of
brucellosis has been reported to range between 3 and 5% (10, 13), the case of B. suis infection presented here was
the first case of neurobrucellosis detected in a reference center of
Argentina that had more than 300 brucellosis patients referred between
1993 and 1997. While most patients seen in this center are infected by
B. abortus and B. suis, almost all the cases of
brucellar meningitis reported in the literature were in the
Mediterranean area, where B. melitensis predominates. This
difference could possibly explain the low incidence of neurobrucellosis
among Argentinian patients. Moreover, some authors have proposed a
separate meningotropism for B. melitensis (11).
At present we do not know the clinical significance of the different
CSF reactivities to Brucella CP shown by the samples from
the B. melitensis cases and the B. suis case in
Western blotting. This difference could reflect the existence of
specific reactivity patterns that could help to distinguish
Brucella species or could also be related to different
stages of the disease (acute or chronic phase). Both possibilities are
currently being assessed in our laboratory.
In conclusion, the ELISA with the Brucella CP antigen is a
useful test in the diagnosis of neurobrucellosis. The assay allows distinction between this serious complication, nonbrucellar meningitis, and systemic brucellosis with neurological manifestations but without
actual CNS infection. This new application would add to the known
usefulness of this test in the diagnosis of systemic human brucellosis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by grant BID 802/OC-AR-PICT 00084 from the
Agencia Nacional de Promoción Cientifica y Tecnológica. P.C.B. was supported by a fellowship from the Consejo Nacional de
Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). C.A.F. is a member of the Research Career of CONICET and is also a member of
the Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
We are very grateful to Guillermo Docena and Eduardo Castaño for
providing the CSF samples from nonbrucellar meningitis and Alzheimer's
disease patients, respectively.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Instituto de
Estudios de la Inmunidad Humoral (IDEHU), Junín 956 4to. piso,
1113 Buenos Aires, Argentina. Phone: 54-11-4964-8259. Fax:
54-11-4964-0024. E-mail: pablobal{at}ffyb.uba.ar.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Araj, G. F.,
A. R. Lulu,
M. A. Saadah,
A. M. Mousa,
I. L. Strannegard, and R. A. Shakir.
1986.
Rapid diagnosis of central nervous system brucellosis by ELISA.
J. Neuroimmunol.
12:173-182[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Araj, G. F.,
A. R. Lulu,
M. I. Khateeb,
M. A. Saadah, and R. A. Shakir.
1988.
ELISA versus routine tests in the diagnosis of patients with systemic and neurobrucellosis.
APMIS
96:171-176[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Araj, G. F., and R. A. Azzam.
1996.
Seroprevalence of brucella antibodies among persons in high-risk occupation in Lebanon.
Epidemiol. Infect.
117:281-288[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Baldi, P. C.,
M. M. Wanke,
M. E. Loza, and C. A. Fossati.
1994.
Brucella abortus cytoplasmic proteins used as antigens in an ELISA potentially useful for the diagnosis of canine brucellosis.
Vet. Microbiol.
41:127-134[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Baldi, P. C.,
G. H. Giambartolomei,
F. A. Goldbaum,
L. F. Abdón,
C. A. Velikovsky,
R. Kittelberger, and C. A. Fossati.
1996.
Humoral immune response against lipopoly saccharide and cytoplasmic proteins of Brucella abortus in cattle vaccinated with B. abortus S19 or experimentally infected with Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 0:9.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
3:472-476[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Baldi, P. C.,
S. E. Miguel,
C. A. Fossati, and J. C. Wallach.
1996.
Serological follow-up of human brucellosis by measuring IgG antibodies to lipopolysaccharide and cytoplasmic proteins of Brucella species.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
22:446-455[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Bouza, E.,
M. García de la Torre,
F. Parras,
A. Guerrero,
M. Rodríguez-Créixems, and J. Gobernado.
1987.
Brucellar meningitis.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
9:810-822[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Diaz, R.,
L. M. Jones, and J. B. Wilson.
1968.
Antigenic relationship of the gram-negative organism causing canine abortion to smooth and rough brucellae.
J. Bacteriol.
95:618-624[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Goldbaum, F. A.,
C. P. Rubbi,
J. C. Wallach,
S. E. Miguel,
P. C. Baldi, and C. A. Fossati.
1992.
Differentiation between active and inactive human brucellosis by measuring antiprotein humoral immune responses.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:604-607[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Shakir, R. A.,
A. S. N. Al-Din,
G. F. Araj,
A. R. Lulu,
A. R. Mousa, and M. A. Saadah.
1987.
Clinical categories of neurobrucellosis: a report on 19 cases.
Brain
110:213-223[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Silva, C. A.,
M. E. Rio,
A. Maia-Gonçalves,
S. Pereira,
M. Palmeira,
M. R. Brito, and C. Cruz.
1980.
Oligoclonal gamma-globulin of cerebrospinal fluid in neurobrucellosis.
Acta Neurol. Scand.
61:42-48[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Wallach, J. C.,
S. E. Miguel,
P. C. Baldi,
E. Guarnera,
F. A. Goldbaum, and C. A. Fossati.
1994.
Urban outbreak of a Brucella melitensis infection in an Argentine family: clinical and diagnostic aspects.
FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.
8:49-56[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Young, E. J.
1989.
Clinical manifestations of human brucellosis, p. 97-126.
In
E. J. Young, and M. J. Corbel (ed.), Brucellosis: clinical and laboratory aspects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 1999, p. 756-759, Vol. 6, No. 5
1071-412X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.