Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, January 1998, p. 38-40, Vol. 5, No. 1
1071-412X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Distribution of CCR5
32 in Human
Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Children and Its Relationship to
Disease Course
Saroj S.
Bakshi,1
Linqi
Zhang,2
David
Ho,2
Soe
Than,1 and
Savita G.
Pahwa1,*
Department of Pediatrics, Division of
Immunology, North Shore University Hospital-New York University School
of Medicine, Manhasset,1 and
The Aaron
Diamond AIDS Research Center, Rockefeller University, New
York,2 New York
Received 23 July 1997/Returned for modification 3 September
1997/Accepted 9 October 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
Homozygosity for a 32-bp deletion in the CCR5 gene (CCR5
32) has
been shown to confer resistance to infection with the macrophage-tropic strain of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1. We examined the
distribution of CCR5
32 in 47 children (age range, 1.5 to 19 years),
of whom 43 were infected with HIV, by the perinatal route
(n = 41) or by the intravenous route
(n = 2). The infected patients were classified as
rapid progressors (RP) (n = 7) (CDC category C3 or
death by 2 years of age), non-rapid progressors (NRP)
(n = 17) (survival for
8 years after infection), or
intermediate (n = 19). CCR5
32 heterozygosity was
found in two HIV-infected children, both NRP. None of the subjects were
homozygous for CCR5
32, and the remaining children had no evidence of
CCR5
32. The presence of CCR5
32 heterozygosity in 4.8% of this,
predominantly non-Caucasian population is consistent with the published
distribution of the mutation. The finding that CCR5
32 was present
only in NRP and not in any RP is in agreement with previous reports
suggesting that heterozygosity for CCR5
32 may confer limited
protection from disease progression.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Viral, immunologic, and genetic host
factors are known to influence the risk of human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) infection and the rate of disease progression. Although the role
of the CD4 molecule as a high-affinity receptor which is necessary but not sufficient for HIV entry has been known for a long time, it is only
recently that the identity and contribution of other coreceptors in HIV
infection and disease pathogenesis have begun to be recognized. One
such receptor is the
-chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) to which macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) strains of HIV-1 must bind in order to
enter the CD4 cell (1, 4, 8, 9).
Chemokines RANTES, MIP-1
, MIP-1
are the natural ligands of CCR5 and inhibit the entry of M-tropic viruses into the cells (5). M-tropic
non-syncytium-inducing viruses are important for establishing infection
by the mucosal route and through inoculation of blood and are believed
to play a role in mother-infant transmission of HIV (16).
They are the predominant viruses early in the disease course. In
contrast, viruses in advanced disease are predominantly T cell tropic,
syncytium-inducing viruses (6, 14, 17) and utilize the other
coreceptor, CXCR-4 (previously known as fusin or LESTR), which like
CCR5 is a seven-transmembrane protein whose ligand has been identified
as the stromal cell-derived factor (10).
A genetic mutation in the CCR5 gene consisting of 32-bp deletion
(CCR5
32 [
32]) results in a nonfunctional chemokine receptor. Homozygosity for this allele (
32/
32) confers strong resistance to
infection by HIV (12, 13). The
32 allele has also been reported to influence the rate of disease progression, although the
data is conflicting (7, 11).
The frequency of the
32 gene in the HIV-infected pediatric
population and its influence on disease progression in HIV-infected children are relatively unknown. The objectives of this study were to
assess the distribution of
32 in a population of HIV-infected children and to study the effect of the
32 mutation on the course of
the disease. No child was found to be homozygous for
32. Two infected subjects, both non-rapid progressors, were heterozygous for
32 (wild type [wt]/
32), but the
32 allele was not identified in any child with rapid disease progression. Although the difference in
the prevalence of wt/
32 in rapid disease progressors compared to
non-rapid disease progressors did not achieve statistical significance (P = 0.076), analysis of disease severity in this
cohort suggests that
32 heterozygosity may contribute to slowing
disease progression.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Patients.
Forty-seven pediatric patients (43 HIV infected, 2 exposed to HIV [mothers were HIV positive], and 2 not exposed to HIV
[mothers were HIV negative]) were evaluated. The infected children
had acquired disease through the perinatal route (n = 41) or through infected blood products (2 hemophiliacs). Children in
the perinatal-infection group ranged in age from 1.7 to 18.8 years.
There were 24 males and 17 females. The two hemophiliacs were 16.6 and
19.5 years of age. Ethnically there were 63% African-Americans, 15%
Caucasians, 10% Latinos, 5% of mixed parentage, 5% Asians, and 2%
of unknown ethnic background.
Disease severity was determined by using the CDC (Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention)-defined clinical and immunologic criteria for
classification of disease in children with HIV infection (3). Rapid progressors were defined as children who died or developed severe clinical disease (CDC category C) or severe immune suppression (CDC immune category 3) by 2 years of age. Patients who
survived for
8 years were considered non-rapid progressors; a subset
of non-rapid progressors who had survived for 12 to 17 years after
acquisition of perinatal infection were designated long-term survivors.
Children who were neither rapid nor non-rapid progressors and ranged in
age from 2 to 8 years were considered to have an intermediate disease
course.
Based on disease severity, 7 (17%) perinatally infected children were
classified as rapid disease progressors, and 15 (37%) were classified
as non-rapid disease progressors; 7 of the non-rapid progressors were
considered to be long-term survivors. There were 19 (44%) children who
had an intermediate disease course. The two hemophiliacs who had
survived for longer than 8 years after acquisition of infection were
considered non-rapid progressors.
CCR5 genotyping.
(See reference 11.) DNA
was isolated from stored peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 43 HIV
infected, 2 uninfected HIV-exposed, and 2 uninfected unexposed
children. To detect the presence or absence of the
32 allele, a
PCR-based assay using primers flanking the 32-bp segment was used to
amplify this region of the CCR5 gene. The presence or absence of the
deletion was then determined by gel electrophoresis as follows.
Briefly, a portion of the CCR5 gene was amplified by PCR from genomic
DNA and analyzed on a 4% Metaphore agarose gel (FMC BioProducts).
Primers CCR5c, 5'-CAAAAAGAAGGTCTTCATTACACC-3', and CCR5d,
5'-CCTGTGCCTCTTCTTCTCATTTCG-3', which flank the 32-bp
deletion were used to generate wild-type and deletion fragments of 189 and 157 bp, respectively. The PCR mixture contained 0.25 mM
deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 20 pmol of each primer, and 0.5 U of
Taq polymerase in 1× reaction buffer (Boehringer Mannheim).
Each PCR amplification consisted of 40 cycles, with the first 5 cycles
consisting of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1.5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s.
HIV RNA was determined by Roche Amplicor assay.
 |
RESULTS |
None of the HIV-infected children had the homozygous gene for
32. The mutant CCR5 allele (wt/
32) was present in 2 (4.2%) of
the 47 children
in none of the 7 rapid disease progressors; in 2 of
the 17 non-rapid disease progressors (11.76%) and of the 36 children
in the combined group of non-rapid progressors and those with
intermediate disease course (5.5%) (Table
1). Differences in the prevalence of the
mutant CCR5 gene between any of the groups were not significant by
Fisher's exact test, although there was a trend towards significance
in the prevalence of wt/
32 in non-rapid progressors compared to the
total study group (P = 0.076). There were no deaths on
follow-up to average ages of 3.7 (1.7 to 5.7) years for the rapid
progressors, 12.8 (8.4 to 19.4) years for non-rapid progressors, and
5.8 (3 to 7.9) years for the intermediate group. None of the uninfected
HIV-exposed or uninfected unexposed children had the mutant allele. The
frequency of the mutant CCR5 allele in this multiethnic population
(African-Americans, Caucasians, Latinos, and Asians) is ~4.8%.
Clinical details of patients with
32 heterozygosity are described
below.
Case 1.
The first patient was an 8-year-old boy born to an
HIV-positive African-American mother and an unknown father. He had
fetal alcohol syndrome and thalassemia minor. The child was first
diagnosed as having HIV infection at 3 years of age when he had septic
arthritis and meningitis (Haemophilus influenza type B),
which led to bilateral severe sensorineural hearing loss, mild
microcephaly, and decreased visual motor coordination. At the time of
the study, he had severe immunosuppression (CD4+, 1%
[absolute count, 13]; CD4/CD8 ratio, 0.03) and viral load of 49,370 RNA copies (4.69 log10)/ml.
Case 2.
The second patient was a 19 1/2-year-old Caucasian
male with hemophilia A infected by contaminated blood products prior to March 1985. He was diagnosed as having HIV infection in 1988 and had
received antiretroviral monotherapy in the past. His clinical course
had been marked by drug reactions, episodes of pancreatitis, chronic
herpes zoster, and spontaneous pneumothorax requiring blebectomy. At
the time of the study, he had severe immunosuppression (no detectable
CD4+ cells for 2 years) and a viral load of >750,000 RNA
copies/ml.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The importance of chemokine receptors for HIV entry and disease
pathogenesis is becoming increasingly apparent (7). A
genetic defect consisting of a deletion of 32 bp in the coding sequence from position 794 to position 825 (
32) has been associated with resistance to HIV infection (13). Our study was undertaken
to evaluate the frequency of
32 in children with HIV infection and to study its influence on disease pathogenesis.
Two patients heterozygous for
32 were identified among HIV-positive
subjects in this study. In agreement with previous studies, these
findings indicate that heterozygosity for
32 does not protect individuals from HIV infection. Several large studies have shown that
the frequencies of wt/
32 in HIV-infected and HIV-negative individuals are similar (7).
The frequency of the heterozygous
32 in our study of HIV-exposed and
-infected children predominantly of nonwhite background was 4.8%. This
frequency is similar to the 1.7% frequency reported by Dean et al. for
the African American population (7). Studies in large
populations show that the mutant CCR5 gene is variably distributed in
different racial groups. In the Western European Caucasian populations,
the
32 allele is found at the high frequency of ~0.20 but has not
been found in any individuals of West African or Central African
origin, in the Japanese, or in other ethnic groups (13).
None of the 43 HIV-infected children studied by us was homozygous for
the
32 gene. The presence of two
32 alleles was initially described for two individuals who had remained uninfected despite repeated exposure to HIV (12). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from these individuals did not transduce CCR5 signals and were
highly resistant to infection in vitro with M-tropic HIV strains.
Phenotypically these individuals were reported to be normal and without
any immune defect. In 2,741 HIV-infected individuals from cohorts of
homosexual men, hemophiliacs, and intravenous drug users from three
different studies, there were no individuals with a homozygous
32
deletion (7). Recently however, an individual of European
descent from among 265 HIV-infected Australian patients was found to be
homozygous for
32 (2).
Because homozygous
32 confers strong protection from infection, it
was surmised that the presence of this deletion may provide some
survival advantage, and many studies have examined the relationship of
the presence of a single mutant allele with the rate of disease progression (11). In our study cohort, the frequency of
wt/
32 did not differ significantly between groups of children with
different rates of disease progression, although there was a trend
towards higher frequency in children who survived longer than 8 years after acquisition of infection and therefore were non-rapid progressors compared to those who died or were in disease category C3 by 2 years of
age. Thus, in our study the presence of a heterozygous
32 allele
appeared to provide a modest degree of protection from rapid disease
progression. These results are similar to those of published studies in
which
32 appears to provide some protection from development of
severe HIV disease in adults (11). Interestingly, we did not
find CCR5
in any of the long-term survivors in our population,
indicating that the modification in the disease course achieved by a
single allele is modest at best. In studies of homosexual cohorts, the
frequency of wt/
32 in the long-term nonprogressors was found to be
twice that in rapid progressors (7). In hemophiliac cohorts,
on the other hand, the difference between the frequencies of the
32
allele in the two groups was not significant (7). This
differential response may be related to differences in routes of
transmission, exposure levels, or viral loads in different risk groups.
In summary, a relatively low frequency (4.8%) of the
32 mutation
was observed in a small cohort of HIV-infected children and adolescents
and was similar to the known frequency in the general nonwhite U.S.
population. None of the infected children had the homozygous deletion.
Children with wt/
32 had a relatively favorable disease course, but
none of the children in our cohort who were truly long-term
nonprogressors had this deletion, indicating that other genetic host or
viral factors may be important in disease pathogenesis in this
population. Study of polymorphism of CCR5 and other genes in large
cohorts of long-term survivors and in HIV-exposed uninfected children
are warranted to determine the roles of such genetic mutations in
protection from vertical infection and/or disease progression in
infants with perinatal HIV exposure.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: 350 Community
Dr., Manhasset, NY 11030. Phone: (516) 562-4641. Fax: (516) 562-2866. E-mail: spahwa{at}nshs.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alkhatib, G.,
C. Combadiere,
C. Broder,
Y. Feng,
P. Kennedy,
P. Murphy, and E. Berger.
1996.
CC CKR5: a RANTES, MIP-1 , MIP-1 receptor as a fusin co-factor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1.
Science
272:1955-1958[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Biti, R.,
R. French,
J. Young,
B. Bennetts, and G. Stewart.
1997.
HIV-1 infection in an individual homozygous for the CCR5 deletion allele.
Nat. Med.
3:252-253[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1994.
1994 revised classification system for HIV-infection in children less than 13 years of age.
Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep.
43(RR-12):1-10.
|
| 4.
|
Choe, H.,
M. Farzan,
Y. Sun,
N. Sullivan,
B. Rollins,
P. Ponath,
L. Wu,
C. Mackay,
G. LaRosa,
W. Newman,
G. Gerard, and J. Sodroski.
1996.
The -chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates.
Cell
85:1135-1148[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cocchi, F.,
A. L. DeVico,
A. Garzino-Demo,
S. K. Arya,
R. C. Gallo, and P. Lusso.
1995.
Identification of RANTES, MIP-1 alpha and MIP-1 beta as the major HIV-suppressive factors produced by CD8+ T cells.
Science
270:1811-1815[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cornelissen, M.,
G. Mulder-Kampinga,
J. Veenstra,
F. Zorgdrager,
C. Kuiken,
S. Hartman,
J. Dekker,
L. van der Hoek,
C. Sol,
R. Coutinho, and J. Goudsmit.
1995.
Syncytium-inducing (SI) phenotype suppression at seroconversion after intramuscular inoculation of a non-syncytium-inducing/SI phenotypically mixed human immunodeficiency virus population.
J. Virol.
69:1810-1818[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Dean, M.,
M. Carrington,
C. Winkler,
G. Huttley,
M. Smith,
R. Allikmets,
J. Goedert,
S. Buchbinder,
E. Vittinghoff,
E. Gomperts,
S. Donfield,
D. Vlahov,
R. Kaslow,
A. Saah,
C. Rinaldo,
R. Detels,
Hemophilia Growth and Development Study,
Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study,
Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study,
San Francisco City Cohort,
ALIVE Study, and S. O'Brien.
1996.
Genetic restriction of HIV-1 infection and progression to AIDS by a deletion allele of the CKR5 structural gene.
Science
273:1856-1862[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Deng, H.,
R. Liu,
W. Ellmeier,
S. Choe,
D. Unutmaz,
M. Burkhart,
P. Di Marzio,
S. Marmon,
R. Sutton,
C. Hill,
C. Davis,
S. Peiper,
T. Schall,
D. Littman, and N. Landau.
1996.
Identification of a major co-receptor for primary isolates of HIV-1.
Nature
381:661-666[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Dragic, T.,
V. Litwin,
G. Allaway,
S. Martin,
Y. Huang,
K. Nagashima,
C. Cayanan,
P. Maddon,
R. Koup,
J. Moore, and W. Paxton.
1996.
HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells is mediated by the chemokine receptor CC-CKR-5.
Nature
381:667-673[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Feng, Y.,
C. Broder,
P. Kennedy, and E. Berger.
1996.
HIV-1 entry cofactor: functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor.
Science
272:872-877[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Huang, Y.,
W. Paxton,
S. Wolinsky,
A. Neumann,
L. Zhang,
T. He,
S. Kang,
D. Ceradini,
Z. Jin,
K. Yazdanbakhsh,
K. Kunstman,
D. Erickson,
E. Dragon,
N. Landau,
J. Phair,
D. Ho, and R. Koup.
1996.
The role of a mutant CCR5 allele in HIV-1 transmission and disease progression.
Nat. Med.
2:1240-1243[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Paxton, W.,
S. Martin,
D. Tse,
T. O'Brien,
J. Skurnick,
N. VanDevanter,
N. Padian,
J. Braun,
D. Kotler,
S. Wolinsky, and R. Koup.
1996.
Relative resistance to HIV-1 infection of CD4 lymphocytes from persons who remain uninfected despite multiple high-risk sexual exposures.
Nat. Med.
2:412-417[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Samson, M.,
F. Libert,
B. Doranz,
J. Rucker,
C. Liesnard,
C. Farber,
S. Saragosti,
C. Lapouméroulie,
J. Cognaux,
C. Forceille,
G. Muyldermans,
C. Verhofstede,
G. Burtonboy,
M. Georges,
T. Imai,
S. Rana,
Y. Yi,
R. Smyth,
R. Collman,
R. Doms,
G. Vassart, and M. Parmentier.
1996.
Resistance to HIV-1 infection in Caucasian individuals bearing mutant alleles of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene.
Nature
382:722-725[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Spijkerman, I.,
M. Koot,
M. Prins,
I. Keet,
A. van der Hoek,
F. Miedema, and R. Coutinho.
1995.
Lower prevalence and incidence of HIV-1 syncytium-inducing phenotype among injecting drug users compared with homosexual men.
AIDS
9:1085-1092[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Unutmaz, D., and D. R. Littman.
1997.
Expression pattern of HIV-1 coreceptors on T cells: implications for viral transmission and lymphocyte homing.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:1615-1618[Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
van't Wout, A.,
N. Kootstra,
G. Mulder-Kampinga,
N. Albrecht-van Lent,
H. Scherpbier,
J. Veenstra,
K. Boer,
R. Coutinho,
F. Miedema, and H. Schuitemaker.
1994.
The macrophage-tropic variants initiate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection after sexual, parenteral, and vertical transmission.
J. Clin. Invest.
94:2060-2067.
|
| 17.
|
Wolinsky, S.,
B. Korber,
A. Neumann,
M. Daniels,
K. Kunstman,
A. Whetsell,
M. Furtado,
Y. Cao,
D. Ho,
J. Safrit, and R. Koup.
1996.
Adaptive evolution of human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 during the natural course of infection.
Science
272:537-542[Abstract].
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, January 1998, p. 38-40, Vol. 5, No. 1
1071-412X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.