CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blagburn, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blagburn, B. L.
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 2005, p. 644-646, Vol. 12, No. 5
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.5.644-646.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cytokine Gene Expression in Response to SnSAG1 in Horses with Equine Protozoal Myeloencephalitis

Jennifer A. Spencer,1* Patricia Deinnocentes,1 Edith M. Moyana,1 Anthony J. Guarino,2 Siobhan E. Ellison,3 R. Curtis Bird,1 and Byron L. Blagburn1

Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849,1 Department of Educational Foundations, Leadership and Technology, College of Education, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849,2 Pathogenes Inc., Fairfield, Florida 326343

Received 17 November 2004/ Returned for modification 22 February 2005/ Accepted 26 February 2005


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM) is a neurologic syndrome seen in horses from the Americas and is mainly caused by Sarcocystis neurona. Recently, a 29-kDa surface antigen from S. neurona merozoites was identified as being highly immunodominant on a Western blot. This antigen has been sequenced and cloned, and the expressed protein has been named SnSAG1. In a previous study, cell-mediated immune responses to SnSAG1 were shown to be statistically significantly reduced in horses with EPM in comparison to EPM-negative control horses. It therefore appears as though the parasite is able to induce immunosuppression towards parasite-derived antigens as parasite-specific responses are decreased. Isolated peripheral blood lymphocytes from 21 EPM (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] Western blot)-negative horses with no clinical signs and 21 horses with clinical signs of EPM (CSF Western blot positive) were cocultured with SnSAG1 for 48 and 72 h, and the effect on cytokine production was investigated by means of reverse transcriptase PCR. Cytokines assayed include gamma interferon (IFN-{gamma}), tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, and IL-6. ß-Actin was used as the housekeeping gene. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test of the findings indicated that there was a statistically significant decrease in IFN-{gamma} production after 48 h in culture for samples from horses with clinical disease. There was also a statistically significant increase in IL-4 production after 72 h in culture for samples from horses with EPM. These results further support the notion that this parasite is able to subvert the immune system in horses with clinical disease.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM) was first recognized in the early 1970s (2, 6, 8) and has subsequently grown in importance as our knowledge of this disease has increased. It is now considered the most important protozoal disease of horses in the Americas (16) and is caused mainly by the apicomplexan parasite Sarcocystis neurona (9).

Sporocysts excreted by opossums (Didelphis virginiana) are the source of S. neurona infection (10), which explains why this disease is observed only in the Americas in the geographic range of the opossum. The natural route of infection for S. neurona is via the gastrointestinal tract, as infection occurs through oral ingestion of sporocysts on contaminated pastures, feed, or drinking water.

Serological surveys of horses have shown that up to 53% have antibodies to S. neurona (3, 4, 18), and up to 38% of healthy horses presenting at Auburn University's College of Veterinary Medicine (donations to the teaching program) have S. neurona antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid (unpublished data). These studies indicate that exposure to this parasite is widespread. However, only a small percentage of infected horses develop overt clinical disease, and this is thought to be related to factors such as the strain of parasite, the infective dose, concurrent infections, and maybe most importantly the immune status of the horse. Recently it was shown that cell-mediated immune responses to a highly immunodominant 29-kDa surface antigen from S. neurona merozoites (SnSAG1) (12, 13) are statistically significantly reduced in horses with EPM (19), and it appears as though the parasite exacerbates this immunosuppression.

Knowledge of the full immune response to infectious agents in equids has been severely hampered by the lack of available reagents. As there is a correlation between gene expression and protein production (5), it can be assumed that detection of gene expression relates to cytokine protein production (14). This paper describes in vitro cytokine induction by the immunodominant protein SnSAG1 as measured by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Horses. The present study included 21 EPM-negative horses (with Western blot-negative cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] samples; EBI, Lexington, KY) and 21 horses with clinical signs of EPM and Western blot-positive CSF samples from Alabama and Florida (19).

Lymphoblastogenesis. Peripheral blood samples were collected by jugular venipuncture into sterile tubes containing EDTA, and lymphocytes were isolated by differential centrifugation on Histopaque-1083 (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri). All in vitro procedures were carried out under aseptic conditions. Lymphocyte numbers were assessed in Turk's white blood cell counting fluid (19), and the concentration was adjusted to 2 x 106 lymphocytes/ml in RPMI 1640 medium (containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, antibiotics, and L-glutamine) (Atlanta Biologicals, Norcross, Georgia). Lymphocytes (containing less than 10% contaminating monocytes or neutrophils) were placed in the wells of 96-well (100 µl/well) round-bottom plates coated with 10 µg/ml of SnSAG1 and incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and 95% air for 48 h and 72 h (17). The cells were then harvested and pelleted in a microcentrifuge, resuspended in RNAlater (QIAGEN, Valencia, California), and stored frozen until assayed by RT-PCR.

RT-PCR. mRNA was isolated by using RNA STAT-60 total RNA/mRNA isolation reagent (Tel-Test, Friendswood, Texas) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The RT-PCR was performed using an Access RT-PCR system kit (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin), also in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Approximately 500 ng of cDNA was used per PCR. The following cytokines were assayed under conditions previously described: gamma interferon (IFN-{gamma}), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-{alpha}), interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6 with ß-actin as the housekeeping gene (14), and IL-4 (7). These cytokines were chosen as they are representative of T helper 1 (Th1) or T helper 2 (Th2) immune responses. The level of gene expression was not quantified, and the results were expressed as the presence or the absence of gene transcripts as visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel (Fig. 1).



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Example of RT-PCR amplicons separated in a 1% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. PCR products were produced by lymphocytes in response to SnSAG1 incubation. Lane 1, 1-kb molecular weight marker; lane 2, RT-PCR positive control; lane 3, ß-actin amplicon; lane 4, IFN-{gamma} amplicon; lane 5, TNF-{alpha} amplicon; lane 6, IL-2 amplicon; lane 7, IL-4 amplicon; lane 8, IL-6 amplicon.

 
Statistics. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to evaluate any statistically significant increased or decreased differences between the cytokine transcripts expressed by EPM-negative and EPM-positive horses in response to SnSAG1 incubation after 48 h or 72 h.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of this study indicate a trend towards an induction of proinflammatory cytokines in response to Sarcocystis neurona infection. A statistically significant difference was reported for IFN-{gamma} for both the 48-h (P = 0.005) and 72-h (P = 0.046) incubation periods, with a decrease in the expression of this cytokine gene in horses with clinical EPM compared with the expression of this gene in EPM-negative horses at 48 h. There was significantly less IFN-{gamma} expression after 48 h of incubation than after 72 h of incubation, indicating a significant lag in expression of this very important cytokine by horses infected with S. neurona. In EPM-negative control horses, there was no evidence of IFN-{gamma} expression after 72 h (Table 1), indicating that there is an early induction of this cytokine in response to this parasite (P > 0.005) in normal horses.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Presence of gene transcripts in response to coculture with SnSAG1 for 48 or 72 h as visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel

 
A statistically significant increase in IL-4 gene expression was also observed after 72 h (P = 0.102) of incubation in horses that were positive for EPM (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of IL-4 gene transcription after 48 or 72 h of incubation in the presence of SnSAG1 in EPM-negative horses.

There were no statistically significant differences in gene expression of any of the other cytokines regardless of the horses' EPM status, although certain trends appeared to be developing. It would appear as though TNF-{alpha}, IL-2, and IL-6 expression levels decrease with time in EPM-negative horses but increase with time in EPM-positive horses.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
S. neurona is able to induce immunosuppression towards parasite-derived antigens as parasite-specific blastogenic responses are decreased (19). The results of this study indicate that this immunosuppression is due, in part, to a trend towards Th1 cytokine gene suppression and Th2 cytokine gene induction. This supports other studies in which it has been shown that levels of cytokines that are important in stimulating cell-mediated responses to protozoan antigens such as Toxoplasma gondii and Leishmania spp. are decreased (17, 20). It is possible that local immunosuppression is being induced by the presence of S. neurona merozoites in horses with clinical EPM, and the extent of this suppression could be related to host genetic factors. This possibility could explain why not all infected horses develop clinical disease.

In the current study, IFN-{gamma} expression was shown to be suppressed in horses with clinical signs of EPM, further supporting the suggestion that S. neurona is able to depress expression of this very important cytokine. From previous studies (19), it has been shown that lymphocyte blastogenesis still occurs after 72 h in response to SnSAG1, thus eliminating the possibility that this protein induces cell death. Infection of immunocompetent mice with S. neurona merozoites does not result in parasitemia or any signs of disease. However, IFN-{gamma} knockout mice succumb to disease, and parasites can be recovered from severe combined immunodeficient Arabian foals, further indicating the importance of this cytokine in disease prevention (11, 15).

IFN-{gamma} is critical in the development of a Th1 response and is produced mainly by T cells and natural killer cells. It has a wide range of biological functions, including antiviral functions, influencing cell-mediated cytotoxicity, priming macrophages, and augmenting production of IL-12, a cytokine which has a pivotal role in upregulation of various immune responses (1).

Interleukin-4 is produced primarily by Th2 cells and also has many biological effects, such as inducing B lymphocytes to undergo immunoglobulin isotype switching to produce immunoglobulin E, suppressing production of TNF-{alpha}, and inhibiting macrophage synthesis of IL-12 (1). The fact that S. neurona is able to upregulate IL-4 gene expression suggests another pathway by which this parasite may be subverting the immune response, resulting in clinical disease.

The observed trend of TNF-{alpha}, IL-2, and IL-6 expression decreasing with time in EPM-negative horses, while increasing with time in EPM-positive horses, could be because these cytokines are produced by macrophages, and the increased production could be due to an anamnestic type of response in EPM-positive horses already exposed to this parasite. Further study examining different incubation times may shed some light in this area.

In conclusion, there are many ways in which protozoan parasites evade host immune responses, and these include changes in cytokine patterns as seen in the present study (20). One can assume that there are many more underlying factors involved, such as genetics of the host, inoculum dose, concurrent infections, and strain of the parasite, as not all infected horses develop disease. Whatever predisposes horses towards disease development may be further exacerbated by the presence of the parasite. Further work in this field is ongoing.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was supported in part by an innovation grant from Fort Dodge Animal Health.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849. Phone: (334) 844-2701. Fax: (334) 844-2652. E-mail: spencja{at}vetmed.auburn.edu. Back


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ainsworth, D. M., J. A. Appleton, S. W. Eicker, R. Luce, M. J. Flamino, and D. F. Antczak. 2003. The effect of strenuous exercise on mRNA concentrations of interleukin-12, interferon-gamma and interleukin-4 in equine pulmonary and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 91:61-71.[Medline]
  2. Beech, J., and D. C. Dodd. 1974. Toxoplasma-like encephalitis in the horse. Vet. Pathol. 11:87-96.[Medline]
  3. Bentz, B. G., D. E. Granstrom, and S. Stamper. 1997. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona in horses residing in a county of southeastern Pennsylvania. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 210:517-518.[Medline]
  4. Blythe, L. L., D. E. Granstrom, D. E. Hansen, L. L. Walker, J. Bartlett, and S. Stamper. 1997. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona in horses residing in Oregon. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 210:482-483.[Medline]
  5. Cherwinski, H. M., J. H. Schumacher, K. D. Brown, and T. Mossman. 1987. Two types of mouse helper T cell clone. III. Further differences in lymphokine synthesis between Th1 and Th2 clones revealed by RNA hybridization, functionally monospecific bioassays, and monoclonal antibodies. J. Exp. Med. 166:1229-1244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Cusick, P. K., D. M. Sells, and G. G. Hamilton. 1974. Toxoplasmosis in two horses. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 164:77-80.[Medline]
  7. Dohmann, K., B. Wagner, D. W. Horohov, and W. Leibold. 2000. Expression and characterization of equine interleukin 2 and interleukin 4. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 77:243-256.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Dubey, J. P., G. W. Davis, A. Koestner, and K. Kiryu. 1974. Equine encephalomyelitis due to a protozoan parasite resembling Toxoplasma gondii. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 165:249-255.[Medline]
  9. Dubey, J. P., S. W. Davis, C. A. Speer, D. D. Bowman, A. De Lahunta, D. E. Granstrom, M. J. Topper, A. Hamir, J. Cummings, and M. M. Suter. 1991. Sarcocystis neurona n. sp. (Protozoa: Apicomplexa), the etiologic agent of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis. J. Parasitol. 77:212-218.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Dubey, J. P., and D. S. Lindsay. 1998. Isolation of a third species of Sarcocystis in immunodeficient mice fed feces from opossums (Didelphis virginiana) and its differentiation from Sarcocystis falcatula and Sarcocystis neurona. J. Parasitol. 84:1158-1164.[Medline]
  11. Dubey, J. P., and D. S. Lindsay. 1998. Isolation in immunodeficient mice of Sarcocystis neurona from opossum (Didelphis virginiana) faeces, and its differentiation from Sarcocystis falcatula. Int. J. Parasitol. 28:1823-1828.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Ellison, S. E., A. L. Omara-Opyeme, C. Yowell, and J. Dame. 2002. Molecular characterization of a major 29 kDa surface antigen of Sarcocystis neurona. J. Parasitol. 32:217-225.
  13. Ellison, S. E. 2001. Development of a recombinant protein for the identification of S. neurona infections in horses. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville.
  14. Giguère, S., and J. F. Prescott. 1999. Quantitation of equine cytokine mRNA expression by reverse transcription-competitive polymerase chain reaction. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 67:1-15.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Long, M. T., M. T. Mines, D. P. Knowles, S. M. Tanhauser, J. B. Dame, T. J. Cutler, R. J. Mackay, and D. C. Sellon. 2002. Sarcocystis neurona: parasitemia in a severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) horse fed sporocysts. Exp. Parasitol. 100:150-154.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Mackay, R. L., S. W. Davis, and J. P. Dubey. 1992. Equine protozoal myeloencephalitis. Compend. Contin. Educ. Pract. Vet. 14:1359-1366.
  17. McCabe, R. E., B. J. Luft, and J. S. Remington. 1984. Effect of murine interferon gamma on murine toxoplasmosis. J. Infect. Dis. 150:961-962.[Medline]
  18. Saville, W. J., S. M. Reed, D. E. Granstrom, K. W. Hinchcliff, C. W. Kohn, T. E. Wittum, and S. Stamper. 1997. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona in horses residing in Ohio. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 210:519-524.[Medline]
  19. Spencer, J. A., S. E. Ellison, A. J. Guarino, and B. L. Blagburn. 2004. Cell-mediated immune responses in horses with equine protozoal myeloencephalitis. J. Parasitol. 90:428-430.[Medline]
  20. Zambrono-Villa, S., D. Rosales-Borjas, J. C. Carrero, and L. Ortiz-Ortiz. 2002. How protozoan parasites evade the immune response. Trends Parasitol. 18:272-278.[CrossRef][Medline]


Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 2005, p. 644-646, Vol. 12, No. 5
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.5.644-646.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blagburn, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blagburn, B. L.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS