CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tiev, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lebleu, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tiev, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lebleu, B.

 Previous Article

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, February 2005, p. 366, Vol. 12, No. 2
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.2.366.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Variability of the RNase L Isoform Ratio (37 Kilodaltons/83 Kilodaltons) in Diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome


    LETTER
 Top
 Letter
 References
 
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a disorder characterized by debilitating fatigue whose etiology and pathophysiology remain unclear. Previous studies showed abnormalities of the RNase L pathway in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients with CFS (1, 2). The ratio of RNase L isoforms (37 kDa/83 kDa ratio [37/83 R]) has therefore been proposed as a potential biochemical marker of CFS, with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 71% when the cutoff ratio was 0.4 (3).

In order to evaluate the variability and reproducibility of the 37/83 R in the diagnosis of CFS, we assayed it in duplicate as described by Demettre et al. (2) once a month for 3 months with nine patients fulfilling CFS criteria (mean age ± standard deviation = 43.1 ± 10.4 years). The accuracy of this ratio in the diagnosis of CFS was also tested and correlated with a clinical tool, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) score, in a case-control study involving 28 CFS patients (mean age, 43.1 ± 10.4 years; MFI, 60.9 ± 14.6) and 24 healthy volunteers (mean age, 40.5 ± 9.9 years; MFI, 27.1 ± 7.7).

The results of these two assays were correlated by the Spearman test for each sample; the means of the results of the assays were calculated, and the results from 3 consecutive months were correlated. Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative prognostic values were calculated with different threshold ratios of RNase L isoforms (0.4, 0.45, and 0.5). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated. The ages of subjects in the two groups were comparable, and the MFI scores of the CFS group were higher than those of the control group (Mann-Whitney U test; P < 0.05).

The correlation between two 37/83 R assays from the PBMC sample was lower for the CFS group than for the control group. Moreover, the correlation decreased with time (r = 0.69, 0.69, and 0.33 at the first, second, and third months, respectively) for the CFS group while staying unchanged for the control group (r = 0.95). The correlations between two average results of 37/83 R at two different months were low. The correlations between the two first two months, the second and third months, and the first and third months were 0.16, 0.14, and –0.03, respectively. The 37/83 R cutoff of 0.4 yielded the best discrimination of CFS patients from controls, with 78.6% sensitivity (95% CI, 20.5 to 46.1%) and 33.3% specificity (95% CI, 46.2 to 72.8%). The positive and negative prognostic values were 59.5% (95% CI, 67.5 to 89.7%) and 53.3% (95% CI, 39.7 to 66.9%), respectively. Finally, the correlations between the MFI and 37/83 R were very weak: 0.14 at the first month, 0.51 at the second month, and -0.3 at the last month.

Our data suggest a high variability and poor reproducibility of the 37/83 R for CFS patients and variations of the 37 kDa/83kDa R results while fatigue remains stable. This variability might be due to the increased proteolytic activity reported for PMBC of patients with CFS (2). Thus, we draw attention to the use of this test. The small sample size of this study could have lowered some correlations, but could not have lowered the variability results.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Letter
 References
 

  1. De Meirleir, K., C. Bisbal, I. Campine, P. De Becker, T. Salehzada, E. Demettre, and B. Lebleu. 2000. A 37 kDa 2-5A binding protein as a potential biochemical marker for chronic fatigue syndrome. Am. J. Med. 108:99-105.[Medline]
  2. Demettre, E., L. Bastide, A. D'Haese, K. De Smet, K. De Meirleir, K. P. Tiev, P. Englebienne, and B. Lebleu. 2002. Ribonuclease L proteolysis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of chronic fatigue syndrome patients. J. Biol. Chem. 277:35746-35751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Tiev, K. P., E. Demettre, P. Ercolano, L. Bastide, B. Lebleu, and J. Cabane. 2003. RNase L levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: 37-kilodalton/83-kilodalton isoform ratio is a potential test for chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 10:315-316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kiet Phong Tiev1*
Mickael Briant1
Mohamed Ziani1
Jean Cabane1
Edith Demettre2
Bernard Lebleu2

Service de Médecine Interne
Hôpital Saint Antoine
184 rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine
75571 Paris Cedex 12, France,1
UMR 5124 CNRS
Université Montpellier
2, place Eugene Bataillon
34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France,2

* Phone: 33 (1) 49 28 30 54,Fax: 33 (1) 49 39 38 85,E-mail: kiet.tiev{at}sat.ap-hop-paris.fr


Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, February 2005, p. 366, Vol. 12, No. 2
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.2.366.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tiev, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lebleu, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tiev, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lebleu, B.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS