Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 2003, p. 886-890, Vol. 10, No. 5
1071-412X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.10.5.886-890.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville,1 Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center,4 Woolfson Children's Hospital,5 St. Luke's Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida,6 Ministry of Health, General Hospital, St. George's, Grenada,2 Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois,3 New England Heart Institute, Manchester,7 Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire8
Received 17 March 2003/ Returned for modification 5 June 2003/ Accepted 23 June 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Streptococcal antibody titers (anti-streptolysin O [ASO], anti-DNase B, and the antibody to the group A carbohydrate [anti-A-Cho]) were determined for the sera from individuals with no history of rheumatic fever and for patients with a history of rheumatic fever who were from the same population of the island of Grenada, West Indies, an area where the incidence of rheumatic fever remains very high (13; P. K. Noah, R. Kopycinski, B. Nelson, unpublished data; and B. Nelson and G. F. Armstrong, personal communications). The levels of the antibodies in these two groups were then compared to those obtained for matched groups of healthy individuals and patients with a history of rheumatic fever from Florida, where the incidence of acute rheumatic fever is low (6).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(i) Nonrheumatic subjects. Nonrheumatic subjects consisted of 30 children of African ancestry: 16 were healthy children, 8 children had congenital heart disease, 4 children had Marfan syndrome, 1 child had congenital rubella, and 1 had congenital hemolytic anemia. These subjects had no history of recent pharyngitis and no evidence of active impetigo or complications of group A streptococcal infections. They were seen in the clinic at the same time as the patients who had rheumatic fever and were matched with these patients for age (range, 4 to 24 years; median age, 14 years).
(ii) Rheumatic fever patients. Patients previously diagnosed as having acute rheumatic fever were scheduled to return to the clinic, where they were reevaluated by one of the physicians involved in this study. The diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever had been established at the time of the original presentation based on the updated Jones criteria (7). The history of their illness and their adherence to prophylaxis were reviewed. The patients received a complete physical examination. Electrocardiogram and echocardiographic studies were performed on patients with suspected cardiac disease, and the results were reviewed by a pediatric cardiologist.
Thirty-two patients were included in the Grenada study. Their ages ranged from 6 to 32 years (median age, 13 years). All patients were of African descent. None of the patients had acute disease at the time of evaluation. The interval from the time of acute disease to the present evaluation for the patients ranged from 0.2 to 20 years, with of a mean of 5.8 years. This interval was <1 year for 3 patients, 1 to 5 years for 16 patients, 6 to 10 years for 7 patients, and 11 to 20 years for 6 patients. Twenty-six of the patients had clinical evidence of chronic valvular heart disease, and five of these patients had undergone surgical repair of their mitral valves. The nature of the valvar disease was confirmed by echocardiography, which was performed at the time of this evaluation on all but two of the patients who had undergone mitral valve replacement. Mitral valve abnormality was present in only 15 patients, combined mitral valve and aortic valve disease was present in 8 patients, and isolated aortic disease was present in 3 patients. Six patients had no clinical or echocardiographic evidence of cardiac disease; five patients had arthritis and one patient had Sydenham chorea as the major manifestation of their disease. Twenty-five of the patients were receiving penicillin prophylaxis: 22 were receiving monthly intramuscular benzathine penicillin G, and 3 were receiving daily oral penicillin.
After the consent of the patients or their parents was obtained, blood was procured from all Grenada subjects for streptococcal antibody tests.
Gainesville, Fla., study. Antibody titers obtained for the Grenada nonrheumatic subjects and the rheumatic fever patients were subsequently compared with titers obtained for 32 nonrheumatic individuals and 32 patients with rheumatic fever from Florida. Only African-American subjects were included.
(i) Nonrheumatic subjects. The nonrheumatic individuals from Florida consisted of healthy school-age children and young adults from whom sera had been procured for previous studies to serve as healthy controls. These subjects were screened at the time of blood procurement and were found to have no history of recent pharyngitis or complications of streptococcal infection. They were matched for age and race with the rheumatic fever patients. The ages of the subjects ranged from 5 to 26 years (median age, 13 years).
(ii) Rheumatic fever patients. The rheumatic fever patients included in the Florida study were age matched (range, 5 to 32 years; median age, 13 years) with the Grenada patients. They were also matched with respect to cardiac involvement. They included 9 patients without cardiac disease and 23 with valvular disease: 14 patients had mitral valve disease, 6 had combined mitral and aortic valve disease, and 3 had isolated aortic valve disease. The interval between the time of acute disease and procurement of blood samples ranged from 0.2 to 24 years, with a mean interval of 5.9 years. The difference between this interval and that of the Grenada patients was not significant (P = 0.49). Data on prophylaxis, available for 21 patients, revealed that 8 of the patients were receiving monthly intramuscular benzathine penicillin G prophylaxis and 13 were receiving oral penicillin prophylaxis.
Streptococcal antibody tests. Serum was separated aseptically from the blood samples obtained from the Grenada subjects prior to transportation for assay in our laboratory (University of Florida, Gainesville). All sera were stored at -20°C. Proportional numbers of sera from each of the study groups were assayed in tandem for the three streptococcal antibodies, namely, ASO, anti-DNase B, and anti-A-Cho. The assays were performed as previously described (4).
Statistical analysis. Analysis of the significance of the difference between means and geometric means of the antibody titers for the different groups was assessed by two sample t tests that assume unequal variance provided in the Excel program in Office 97 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Wash.). Differences were considered significant if the P value obtained by one-tailed analysis was <0.05.
This study was approved by the University of Florida Medical Center Review Board for the protection of human subjects.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The data obtained in this study confirmed prior observations regarding the presence of significant differences in the levels of streptococcal antibodies between healthy individuals and patients with rheumatic fever in Florida, an area with a low prevalence of rheumatic fever (6). However, this difference did not hold when we compared the streptococcal antibody titers of nonrheumatic individuals to the titers of patients with rheumatic fever in Grenada, an area with a high incidence of rheumatic fever (13; P. K. Noah, R. Kopycinski, and B. Nelson, unpublished data; B. Nelson and G. F. Armstrong, personal communications). The reason for this discrepancy became apparent when the antibody titers of the nonrheumatic populations in Grenada and Florida were compared. This revealed that the streptococcal antibody titers in the nonrheumatic group from Grenada were significantly higher than the titers of the healthy individuals from Florida (Table 2).
The most likely explanation for this finding is that children in Grenada are subjected to a high frequency of group A streptococcal infections in the form of pharyngitis or impetigo.
As in other tropical regions, impetigo is reported to be highly prevalent in Grenada (B. Nelson, personal communication). While this may account for the high levels of anti-DNase B in the nonrheumatic population in Grenada, the presence of ASO titers in the Grenada nonrheumatic population that are significantly higher than those of the healthy population in Florida favors the probability that streptococcal pharyngitis also contributed to the elevated streptococcal antibodies encountered in the nonrheumatic population from Grenada. This conclusion is based on previous observations that show that patients with impetigo most often show a brisk anti-DNase B response but a feeble ASO response (10).
It is of interest that, despite the significantly lower anti-DNase B levels in Grenadian rheumatic fever patients than in the local controls, a finding that reflects more recent streptococcal infections in the latter group, the anti-A-Cho levels were significantly higher in the rheumatic fever population. This is consistent with earlier reports (1, 8, 15) which showed that the anti-A-Cho levels remain elevated for several years in patients with persistent rheumatic mitral valve insufficiency but not in patients without cardiac sequelae or with transient carditis. This finding suggests that in patients with mitral valve disease who do not have a history of acute rheumatic fever, the presence of an elevated anti-A-Cho titer in the presence of normal ASO and anti-DNase B titers would favor a rheumatic fever etiology as the cause of the mitral valve disease. In areas such as Grenada, where streptococcal infections are highly prevalent, one should approach the interpretation of an elevated anti-A-Cho titer with care and should utilize the finding of an elevated anti-A-Cho titer as evidence for a rheumatic fever etiology in a patient with isolated mitral valve insufficiency and no history of a preceding episode of acute rheumatic fever but only if the elevated anti-A-Cho titer is accompanied by normal ASO and/or anti-DNase B titers.
Other than a study done by Urdhal et al. (18), our review of the published literature failed to reveal studies that evaluated the levels of streptococcal antibodies in healthy individuals from populations with a high frequency of streptococcal infections and/or a high incidence of rheumatic fever. Urdahl and his coworkers determined the serum antistreptokinase titers in the sera of nonrheumatic adult aboriginals in Australia, a population with a very high incidence of streptococcal infection (18). They found that the geometric mean titer of this streptococcal antibody was almost 20 times higher than that in nonaboriginal adults. This study, together with data derived from the present study, indicate that the levels of the streptococcal antibodies in healthy populations can vary substantially, depending on the frequency of streptococcal infections in those populations.
Susceptibility to rheumatic fever in certain individuals has been ascribed to a number of factors. These include genetic determinants, for example, HLAs, and the presence of certain markers such as the B-cell alloantigens (reviewed in reference 2). One of the factors originally considered in rheumatic fever susceptibility is an innate state of immune hyperresponsiveness, particularly to streptococcal antigens (12, 14, 16, 17). While the high frequency of streptococcal infection in a population such as the one in Grenada may promote the expression of acute rheumatic fever, an alternate explanation to consider is that individuals in such an area develop or possess an innate immune hyperresponsiveness to streptococcal antigens. Whether the high rate of expression of rheumatic fever in certain populations is related to a high frequency of streptococcal infections per se or to that in combination with an innate state of hyperimmune responsiveness to streptococcal antigens remains to be determined.
A number of variables should be taken into consideration while interpreting the results of streptococcal antibody titers in the context of their relationship to the epidemiology of group A streptococcal infections or the role of such infections in the pathogenesis of rheumatic fever. The results of this study point to yet another variable, the need to consider the background frequency of streptococcal infections in certain populations when the streptococcal antibody titers of rheumatic fever and nonrheumatic populations are being compared. Differences in the distribution of the titers of antibodies between such populations will become apparent when the titers in nonrheumatic subjects from an area with a high incidence of rheumatic fever are compared to those of a similar population from an area with a low incidence of this disease. Had this comparison not been done in the present study, it is not inconceivable that one might have concluded on the basis of the data obtained from Grenada that group A streptococcal infection does not play a role in the pathogenesis of rheumatic fever.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We acknowledge the technical assistance of Elaine Harden in performing the antibody assays.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. | Infect. Immun. |
|---|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | J. Virol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |