Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, November 2000, p. 867-871, Vol. 7, No. 6
Laboratory for Exotic Viral Infections, WHO Center
for Arboviruses and Hemorrhagic Fevers Reference and Research,
Institute of Virology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Received 2 April 2000/Returned for modification 6 May 2000/Accepted 19 July 2000
The performance of six commercially available immunoassay systems
for the detection of dengue virus-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM)
and IgG antibodies in serum was evaluated. These included two IgM and
IgG enzyme immunoassays (EIA) from MRL Laboratories and PanBio, a
rapid immunochromatographic test (RIT) from PanBio, immunofluorescence assays (IFA) from Progen, a dot blot assay from
Genelabs, and a dipstick EIA from Integrated Diagnostics (INDX). For this study a panel of 132 serum samples, including 90 serum
samples from patients with suspected dengue virus infection and 42 serum samples from patients with other viral infections, was used. In
addition, serial serum samples from two monkeys experimentally immunized and challenged with dengue virus type 2 were used. Results were considered conclusive when concordant results were obtained with
four of the six antibody-specific assays. Based on this definition, the
calculated overall agreement for the human serum samples for the
respective IgM immunoassays was 97% (128 of 132), with 34% (45 of
132) positive serum samples, 63% (83 of 132) negative samples, and 3%
of samples (4 of 132) showing discordant results. The calculated overall agreement for the IgG assays was 94% (124 of 132), with 49%
(65 of 132) positive, 45% (59 of 132) negative, and 6% (8 of 132)
discordant results, respectively. The sensitivities of the
dengue virus-specific assays evaluated varied between 71 and 100% for
IgM and between 52 and 100% for IgG, with specificities of 86 to 96%
and 81 to 100%, respectively. The relative sensitivities of
the respective IgM assays measured with the monkey serum
samples were comparable with those obtained with 12 serial serum
samples from humans. Overall performance, based on the sum of the
agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa statistics of the IgM
and IgG immunoassays, showed that the antibody detection systems from INDX and Genelabs and the MRL and PanBio EIA are useful and reliable assays for dengue virus serodiagnosis.
1071-412X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of Six Immunoassays for Detection of Dengue
Virus-Specific Immunoglobulin M and G Antibodies
*
Corresponding author: Mailing address: Institute of
Virology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 10-463-5428. Fax: 31 10-463-3441. E-mail: groen{at}viro.fgg.eur.nl.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. | Infect. Immun. |
|---|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | J. Virol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |