Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 2000, p. 336-343, Vol. 7, No. 3
Department of Medicine/Infectious Diseases,
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
462021; Harvard School of Public Health,
Boston, Massachusetts 021462; Division
of HIV/AIDS, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia
303333; and The Children's Memorial
Hospital and Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University
Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 606144
Received 26 April 1999/Returned for modification 3 August
1999/Accepted 27 September 1999
A single-platform technology that uses an internal bead standard
and three-color flow cytometry to determine CD4 and CD8 absolute counts
was evaluated for reproducibility and agreement. Values obtained using
TruCount absolute-count tubes were compared to those obtained using a
two-color predicate methodology. Sixty specimens from human
immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected donors were shipped to five
laboratories. Each site also analyzed replicates of 14 human
immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected local specimens at 6 h and
again at 24 h. The interlaboratory variability was significantly
less with TruCount (median difference in percent coefficient of
variation [%CV] between the two methods was
1071-412X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of TruCount Absolute-Count Tubes for
Determining CD4 and CD8 Cell Numbers in Human Immunodeficiency
Virus-Positive Adults
and
8% and
3% for CD4
and CD8, respectively) than with the predicate method. Intralaboratory
variability was smaller, with a median difference in %CV of
1% for
both CD4 and CD8 with 6-h samples and
2% and
3% for CD4 and CD8,
respectively, with 24-h samples. Use of TruCount for shipped samples
resulted in a median CD4 count change of 7 cells (50th estimated
percentile) when all laboratories and CD4 strata were combined. For
on-site samples, the median CD4 count change was 10 CD4 cells for 6-h
samples and 2 CD4 cells for 24-h samples. Individual site biases
occurred in both directions and cancelled each other when the data were
combined for all laboratories. Thus, the combined data showed a smaller
change in median CD4 count than what may have occurred at an individual
site. In summary, the use of TruCount decreased both the inter- and
intralaboratory variability in determining absolute CD4 and CD8 counts.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1001 W. 10th St. Room OPW 430, Indianapolis, IN 46202-2879. Phone: (317) 630-6971. Fax: (317) 630-7522. E-mail:
cschnizl{at}iupui.edu.
S. Mudzinski, Albany Medical College; S. Peters, Georgetown
University Hospital; S. Plaeger, University of California, Los Angeles,
School of Medicine; C. Schnizlein-Bick, Indiana University School of
Medicine; C. Spina, University of California, San Diego, School of
Medicine; M. Waxdal and C. Monical, FAST Systems; J. Lowder and A. Shiba, BD Biosciences.
E. Bessent, University of California, San Diego; A. Donnenberg and
S. Douglas, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; F. Mandy, Bureau for
HIV/AIDS and STD, LCDC, Health Canada; J. Nicholson, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention; M. O'Gorman, Northwestern University
Medical School; S. Plaeger, University of California, Los Angeles; K. Reimann, J. Spritzler, and C. Wilkening, Harvard School of Public
Health; J. Schmitz, University of North Carolina; C. Schnizlein-Bick,
Indiana University; J. Kagan and D. Livnat, Division of AIDS, National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. | Infect. Immun. |
|---|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | J. Virol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |