CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barber, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barber, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, T. J.

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, November 1999, p. 791-798, Vol. 6, No. 6
1071-412X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Inducible and Constitutive In Vitro Neutrophil Chemokine Expression by Mammary Epithelial and Myoepithelial Cells

Michele R. Barber, Alexander G. Pantschenko, Lynn S. Hinckley, and T. J. Yang*

Department of Pathobiology, The University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269

Received 29 March 1999/Returned for modification 4 June 1999/Accepted 28 July 1999

Previously, our laboratory showed that bovine and caprine mammary secretions are chemotactic and that chemoattractants found in these secretions are qualitatively different according to infection status and/or lactation stage. However, the cellular source of the chemoattractants has not been defined. In this study we used a modified Boyden chamber assay to examine the ability of previously established caprine mammary epithelial cell (CMEC) and myoepithelial cell (CMMyoEC) lines to produce chemoattractants for neutrophils. We found that CMEC culture supernatants, but not those of CMMyoEC cultures, induced in vitro neutrophil chemotaxis. Further characterization showed that chemotactic activity was produced when the cells underwent contact-induced differentiation. Neutrophil migration was chemotactic, not chemokinetic, and was augmented when the epithelial and myoepithelial cells were cocultured. Additionally, chemotactic activity was inducible by Staphylococcus aureus plus alpha-toxin, Escherichia coli, and interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta ) in CMEC cultures. However, CMMyoEC cultures could not be induced to produce chemotactic activity. Anti-IL-8 antibody was able to block some constitutively produced chemotactic activity and chemotactic activity induced by IL-1beta and S. aureus plus alpha-toxin. These results indicate that epithelial cells may play a major role in producing chemoattractants, specifically IL-8, in the mammary gland.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The University of Connecticut, Department of Pathobiology, U-89, Storrs, CT 06269-3089. Phone: (860) 486-3739. Fax: (860) 486-2794. E-mail: Tyang{at}UconnVM.Uconn.Edu.


Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, November 1999, p. 791-798, Vol. 6, No. 6
1071-412X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.