CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wellenberg, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Oirschot, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wellenberg, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Oirschot, J. T.

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, July 1999, p. 447-451, Vol. 6, No. 4
1071-412X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of Newly Developed Immunoperoxidase Monolayer Assays for Detection of Antibodies against Bovine Herpesvirus 4

G. J. Wellenberg,* E. M. A. van Rooij, J. Maissan, and J. T. Van Oirschot

Department of Mammalian Virology, Institute for Animal Science and Health (ID-DLO), 8200 AB, Lelystad, The Netherlands

Received 7 January 1999/Accepted 25 February 1999

This study describes the evaluation of immunoperoxidase monolayer assays (IPMAs) for detection of antibodies against bovine herpesvirus 4 (BHV4) DN-599 or BHV4 LVR 140 in sera of cattle. We compared the quality of these IPMAs with the quality of a BHV4 indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition, a preliminary serological survey of BHV4 antibodies was carried out to estimate the seroprevalence of BHV4 in Dutch cattle at different ages. The specificities of both BHV4 IPMAs were 1.00. The geometrical mean titers (detection limit) of the BHV4 IPMAs were twice as high as that of the BHV4 indirect ELISA. In experimentally infected cattle, BHV4 antibodies were detectable by IPMAs 16 to 18 days postinfection, which was almost 2 weeks earlier than in the indirect ELISA. The reproducibility of the BHV4 DN-599 IPMA (kappa D value, 0.92) and of the BHV4 LVR 140 IPMA (kappa D value, 0.87) were good. For field sera the overall agreement between the BHV4 indirect ELISA and the two BHV4 IPMAs, DN-599 and LVR 140, was 95 and 96%, respectively. The serological-survey study showed that the estimated seroprevalence of BHV4 in Dutch cattle was 16 to 18% and that the percentage of BHV4-positive animals varied by age category (between 6 and 43%). In summary, the two BHV4 IPMA formats have several advantages that make IPMA a useful alternative to the BHV4 indirect ELISA for detecting BHV4 antibodies in cattle.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for Animal Science and Health (ID-DLO), Department of Mammalian Virology, Edelhertweg 15, P.O. Box 65, 8200 AB, Lelystad, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-320-238219. Fax: 31-320-238050. E-mail: G.J.Wellenberg{at}id.dlo.nl.


Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, July 1999, p. 447-451, Vol. 6, No. 4
1071-412X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.