This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lieberman, M. M. Articles by Pinney, C. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lieberman, M. M. Articles by Pinney, C. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, Nov 1996, 654-662, Vol 3, No. 6
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparative study of neutrophil activation by chemiluminescence and flow cytometry

MM Lieberman, DM Sachanandani and CA Pinney
Department of Clinical Investigation, Fitzsimons Army Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado 80045-5001, USA.

Neutrophil activation by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and zymosan was assessed by luminol-dependent chemiluminescence (CL) in a novel microtiter plate format and by flow cytometry (FC) based on the oxidation of dihydrorhodamine 123. The results of this comparison demonstrated striking differences in kinetic parameters between these two techniques for neutrophil activation by PMA and zymosan. PMA activation, as determined by FC, was found to be an all-or-none phenomenon in that below a critical concentration of PMA, few cells were positive. Above this concentration, almost all cells were positive; however, the fluorescence intensity of positive cells increased with an increasing PMA concentration until a plateau (maximal) level was reached. In contrast, increasing zymosan concentrations resulted in proportionate increases in the percentage of positive cells until close to 100% of cells were positive. However, the fluorescence intensity of positive cells remained about the same. CL activity increased proportionately with either PMA or zymosan concentration until a maximal level was achieved. The concentration of PMA required for half-maximal activity was about 10-fold higher for FC than for CL, whereas the analogous concentration of zymosan was about 30-fold higher for CL than for FC. In addition, opsonization had only a small negative effect on the ability of zymosan to activate neutrophils, as determined by FC, whereas it had a very large enhancing effect when determined by CL. The differences in kinetic parameters of activation suggest differential sensitivity to particulate (zymosan) versus soluble (PMA) stimulants for FC and CL.