CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tolfvenstam, T.
Right arrow Articles by Broliden, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tolfvenstam, T.
Right arrow Articles by Broliden, K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, Mar 1996, 147-150, Vol 3, No. 2
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of serological assays for identification of parvovirus B19 immunoglobulin M

T Tolfvenstam, U Ruden and K Broliden
Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Stockholm.

Three different enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Parvoscan-B19, IBL parvovirus B19, and IDEIA parvovirus B19) and one immunofluorescence assay (Biotrin Parvo B19 IFA) were evaluated for detection of parvovirus B19 immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in 203 clinical serum samples. An IgM antibody capture radioimmunoassay was used as a reference test. Serum specimens obtained from patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of parvovirus B19 infections were used to evaluate the sensitivities of the assays, which were shown to be comparable for the Biotrin IFA and IDEIA (97%) and lower for the other two EIAs (90%). In order to test the specificity of the assays, clinical serum samples with IgM antibodies against other viruses were examined, as well as sera with rheumatoid factor activity and sera from healthy pregnant women. The specificities of B19 IgM antibody detection were 96% for the Biotrin IFA, 96% for IDEIA, 90% for Parvoscan, and 88% for the IBL assay. These results show that all four assays can be recommended for diagnostic purposes, although false-positive results may be seen with other acute viral infections, healthy pregnant women, and rheumatoid factor-positive samples.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.