CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Louie, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sperber, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Louie, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sperber, K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, Jul 1995, 426-433, Vol 2, No. 4
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Impairment of monocytic function after influenza virus infection

M Louie, J Yoo, T Moran, L Mayer and K Sperber
Division of Clinical Immunology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York 10029, USA.

In order to analyze the immunosuppression associated with influenza virus infection, we investigated monocytic function in macrophage hybridoma cell lines 5 weeks after infection with two strains of influenza virus. Clones 30 and 63, chosen for stability in long-term culture, were infected with two strains of influenza virus, X-31 and PR- 8. Uniform infection of both cell lines was confirmed by intracytoplasmic staining with the antihemagglutinin strain-specific monoclonal antibodies PY 102 and PY 206. One week after infection, clones 30 and 63 lost their ability to stimulate tetanus toxoid- specific major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-matched responder T cells. Coincident with the inability to stimulate MHC-matched T cells, there was diminished surface expression of class II MHC antigens and LFA-1-alpha and LFA-3 compared with that in uninfected cells: DR, 2.5 versus 10.6% (mean channel 0.3 versus 1.5); DQ, 1.6 versus 15.6% (mean channel 0.3 versus 3.0); DP, 5.0 versus 30.9% (mean channel 0.3 versus 2.0). LFA-1-alpha expression was reduced (13.1 versus 20.0%; mean channel 1.5 versus 2.0) while LFA-3 expression remained the same (22.2 versus 324%; mean channel 3.0 versus 3.3). Class I MHC surface antigen expression was unaltered. Cytokine secretion was also perturbed, as interleukin 1-alpha (IL-1-alpha) and IL-1-beta production was lost 1 week after infection. Production of IL-12 and IL-10 was unchanged, while IL-6 production was increased.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.