This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: CVI.00442-06v1 14/6/738    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kagulire, S. C. Articles by Reynolds, S. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kagulire, S. C. Articles by Reynolds, S. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, June 2007, p. 738-740, Vol. 14, No. 6
1071-412X/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00442-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Performance of Two Commercial Immunochromatographic Assays for Rapid Detection of Antibodies Specific to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Types 1 and 2 in Serum and Urine Samples in a Rural Community-Based Research Setting (Rakai, Uganda)

Rakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda,¹ Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda,² Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland,³ Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland,⁴ NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland⁵

Received 21 November 2006/ Returned for modification 31 January 2007/ Accepted 27 March 2007

Rapid detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies is of great importance in developing and developed countries to diagnose HIV infections quickly and at low cost. In this study, two new immunochromatographic rapid tests for the detection of HIV antibodies (Aware HIV-1/2 BSP and Aware HIV-1/2 U; Calypte Biomedical Corporation) were evaluated in rural Africa to determine the tests' performance and comparability to commercially available conventional enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Western blot (WB) tests. This prospective study was conducted from March 2005 through May 2005 using serum and urine from respondents in the Rakai Community Cohort Survey. Nine hundred sixty-three serum samples were tested with the Aware blood rapid assay (Aware-BSP) and compared to two independent EIAs for HIV plus confirmatory Calypte WB for any positive EIAs. The sensitivity of Aware-BSP was 98.2%, and the specificity was 99.8%. Nine hundred forty-two urine samples were run using the Aware urine assay (Aware-U) and linked to blood sample results for analysis. The sensitivity of Aware-U was 88.7% and specificity was 99.9% compared to blood EIAs confirmed by WB analysis. These results support the adoption of the Aware-BSP rapid test as an alternative to EIA and WB assays for the diagnosis of HIV in resource-limited settings. However, the low sensitivity of the Aware-U assay with its potential for falsely negative HIV results makes the urine assay less satisfactory.

Published ahead of print on 11 April 2007.