CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toptygina, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Alioshkin, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toptygina, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Alioshkin, V. A.
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, July 2005, p. 845-847, Vol. 12, No. 7
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.7.845-847.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Immunoglobulin G Subclass Profile of Antimeasles Response in Vaccinated Children and in Adults with Measles History

Anna P. Toptygina,1* Alexander L. Pukhalsky,2 and Vladimir A. Alioshkin1

G. N. Gabrichevsky Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, Russia,1 Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow, Russia2

Received 20 January 2005/ Returned for modification 22 February 2005/ Accepted 21 April 2005

The aim of this study was to investigate measles-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclass profile in vaccinated children and in adults with natural infection. Serum samples were collected before and 30 days after vaccination. The sera from 51 late convalescent adults and seven adults with natural measles infection at the 12th day after onset of rash have been also investigated. Measles IgG antibodies and specific IgG subclasses were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent techniques. In children younger than 3 years, the predominant subclass was IgG3, which contributed, on average, 63.3% of the total IgG response. The contributions of specific IgG1 and IgG4 to the total IgG antimeasles response were lower (19.9% and 16.8%, respectively), whereas IgG2 was not found. In contrast, in the group of children older than 4 years, just IgG2 was a predominant subclass; it contributed 42.6% of the total IgG response. Other subclasses were also present but the contribution was much lower. In adult volunteers with measles history, IgG2 was a predominant subclass of total IgG. Thus, in early convalescence IgG2 contributed 62% of the total IgG response, whereas in late convalescence the contribution was lower (41.4%). There were no visible differences in IgG subclass composition between subjects with natural infection and vaccinated children except those below 3 years of age. The humoral immune response of such subjects is immature and the IgG2 subclass of virus-specific antibodies has not been revealed in the sera.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: G. N. Gabrichevsky Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, 10 Admiral Makarov Street, Moscow, 125212, Russia. Phone: 7-095-1118568. Fax: 7-095-4521830. E-mail: toptyginaanna{at}rambler.ru.


Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, July 2005, p. 845-847, Vol. 12, No. 7
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.7.845-847.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.