CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haghighi, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sharif, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haghighi, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sharif, S.
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, December 2005, p. 1387-1392, Vol. 12, No. 12
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.12.1387-1392.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Modulation of Antibody-Mediated Immune Response by Probiotics in Chickens

Hamid R. Haghighi,1 Jianhua Gong,2 Carlton L. Gyles,1 M. Anthony Hayes,1 Babak Sanei,3 Payvand Parvizi,1 Haris Gisavi,1 James R. Chambers,2 and Shayan Sharif1*

Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada,1 Food Research Program, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada,2 Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Guelph, Ontario, Canada3

Received 17 June 2005/ Returned for modification 15 July 2005/ Accepted 14 September 2005

Probiotic bacteria, including Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum, have been shown to enhance antibody responses in mammals. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of a probiotic product containing the above bacteria in addition to Streptococcus faecalis on the induction of the chicken antibody response to various antigens, both systemically and in the gut. The birds received probiotics via oral gavage and subsequently were immunized with sheep red blood cells (SRBC) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) to evaluate antibody responses in serum or with tetanus toxoid (TT) to measure the mucosal antibody response in gut contents. Control groups received phosphate-buffered saline. Overall, BSA and SRBC induced a detectable antibody response as early as week 1 postimmunization (p.i.), which lasted until week 3 p.i. Probiotic-treated birds had significantly (P ≤ 0.001) more serum antibody (predominantly immunoglobulin M [IgM]) to SRBC than the birds that were not treated with probiotics. However, treatment with probiotics did not enhance the serum IgM and IgG antibody responses to BSA. Immunization with TT resulted in the presence of specific IgA and IgG antibody responses in the gut. Again, treatment with probiotics did not change the level or duration of the antibody response in the gut. In conclusion, probiotics enhance the systemic antibody response to some antigens in chickens, but it remains to be seen whether probiotics have an effect on the generation of the mucosal antibody response.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada. Phone: (519) 824-4120, ext. 54641. Fax: (519) 824-5930. E-mail: shayan{at}uoguelph.ca.


Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, December 2005, p. 1387-1392, Vol. 12, No. 12
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.12.1387-1392.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.