CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cagiola, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rutili, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cagiola, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rutili, D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 2004, p. 952-956, Vol. 11, No. 5
1071-412X/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.11.5.952-956.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Analysis of Possible Factors Affecting the Specificity of the Gamma Interferon Test in Tuberculosis-Free Cattle Herds

M. Cagiola,1* F. Feliziani,1 G. Severi,1 P. Pasquali,2 and D. Rutili1

Istituto Zooprofilattico dell'Umbria e delle Marche, Perugia,1 Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy2

Received 24 February 2004/ Returned for modification 12 April 2004/ Accepted 22 June 2004

Bovine tuberculosis (TB) is still a zoonotic problem in the world. Despite the fact that eradication programs for bovine TB are being implemented in many countries, it remains a public health problem. These programs are mainly based on a single intradermal tuberculin test using bovine tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD), isolation, and slaughtering of infected animals. The aim of this study was to assess the specificity of the gamma interferon (IFN-{gamma}) test in TB-free cattle herds, by using not only Australian tuberculins but also tuberculins produced at our institute, and to correlate the response with the type of production (beef cattle, dairy cattle, and a dual-purpose breed), the housing system, and the age of the animals. We studied 800 animals selected from 20 TB- and paratuberculosis-free herds. The animals were tested in parallel, after stimulation with Australian tuberculins and tuberculins produced at our institute, by using the skin test and two IFN-{gamma} assays. The results of this trial showed that the specificity of the IFN-{gamma} test is higher than that of the skin test (96.8%) and ranges from 97.3% (using only Australian tuberculins) to 98.6% (using tuberculins produced at our institute). We found that different categories of cattle could influence the specificity of the skin test but that these differences tended to be reduced in the IFN-{gamma} assay, especially when Italian PPDs were used.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Istituto Zooprofilattico dell'Umbria e delle Marche, via G. Salvemini 1, 06100 Perugia, Italy. Phone: 39-075-343222. Fax: 39-075-35047. E-mail: m.cagiola{at}pg.izs.it.


Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, September 2004, p. 952-956, Vol. 11, No. 5
1071-412X/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.11.5.952-956.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.