CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Tassell, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkins, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Tassell, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkins, T. D.

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, Sep 1994, 578-584, Vol 1, No. 5
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Characterization of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis by a toxin- specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

RL Van Tassell, DM Lyerly and TD Wilkins
Department of Biochemistry and Anaerobic Microbiology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0305, USA.

Within the past decade, certain strains of Bacteroides fragilis have been associated with diarrhea in humans and cytotoxic activity on certain colon carcinoma cell lines. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting the enterotoxin of B. fragilis in cultures and stools was developed by using high-titer monospecific goat and rabbit antitoxins in an indirect format. The lower limit of detection for purified toxin was approximately 0.05 micrograms/ml; the linear range was from 0.05 to 10 microgram/ml. Using the ELISA to screen cultures of toxigenic and nontoxigenic strains of B. fragilis, we observed 100% correlation with 16 known toxigenic strains which had various cytotoxic activities on HT-29 cells. In addition, we found 6 of 62 previously untested strains also to be positive in both assays. Stability studies revealed that although the cytotoxic activities of crude and purified toxin preparations incubated at elevated temperatures were rapidly lost, the ELISA responses were not significantly reduced. Sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and SDS-capillary electrophoresis showed that the purified toxin autodigested to several stable peptides. Studies on partially purified membranes from the toxigenic strains revealed the presence of several membrane-associated components which were noncytotoxic but strongly immunoreactive in the ELISA. Preliminary studies with spiked feces indicated that the ELISA may be useful for screening not only cultures for the enterotoxigenic B. fragilis but also stool specimens. Ongoing studies are focusing on determining the nature of the toxin's apparent proteolytic capabilities and investigating the feasibility of using the ELISA on stool specimens from healthy and diarrheic humans.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.