CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prince, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lal, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prince, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lal, R. B.

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 1994, 273-282, Vol 1, No. 3
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Spontaneous lymphocyte proliferation in human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) and HTLV-II infection: T-cell subset responses and their relationships to the presence of provirus and viral antigen production

HE Prince, J York, J Golding, SM Owen and RB Lal
Cellular Immunology Laboratory, American Red Cross Blood and Tissue Services, Los Angeles, California 90006, USA.

Spontaneous lymphocyte proliferation (SLP) during in vitro culture of mononuclear cells (MCs) characterizes over half of asymptomatic individuals infected with human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV- I) or HTLV-II. Both CD4 and CD8 T-cell subsets within MC cultures are activated during SLP, as judged by high-density CD25 (CD25bright) expression; it is unclear, however, whether both cell subsets can directly undergo SLP. In the present investigation, the SLP capacities of purified CD8 and CD4 cells were examined in subjects infected with HTLV-I (n = 19) or HTLV-II (n = 54) in relation to the SLP status of MCs from each subject. No increase in SLP was observed for CD8 or CD4 cells from SLP-negative (SLP-) HTLV-infected subjects, whereas robust SLP characterized CD8 cells from all SLP-positive (SLP+) individuals, regardless of HTLV type. In contrast, SLP+ CD4 cells characterized only 23% (7 of 31) of HTLV-II+ SLP+ individuals, whereas SLP+ CD4 cells characterized 100% of HTLV-I+ SLP+ individuals. In cocultures of HTLV- II+ SLP+ CD8 cells and autologous SLP- CD4 cells, sizable proportions of both CD8 cells and CD4 cells coexpressed CD25bright, suggesting that SLP- CD4 cells were activated in the presence of SLP+ CD8 cells. PCR analysis for tax sequences detected provirus in most CD4- and CD8-cell preparations from HTLV-seropositive individuals, regardless of type and the SLP status of cell subsets. To determine whether SLP was associated with activation of viral genes, levels of HTLV-I and HTLV-II core antigen (Ag) in supernatants were measured. Viral Ag production and SLP responses were significantly correlated for both CD4 and CD8 cells in both HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections. However, inhibition of CD8- or CD4- cell SLP by cyclosporin A or anti-Tac (anti-CD25) did not reduce Ag production, indicating that Ag production is not coupled to SLP. These findings show that CD4 cells from SLP+ HTLV-I+ and SLP+ HTLV-II+ individuals differ in SLP capacity, that the absence of SLP does not indicate a lack of infection, and that production of viral Ag is associated with, but not dependent on, SLP.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.