CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dupont, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Raoult, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dupont, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Raoult, D.

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 03 1994, 189-196, Vol 1, No. 2
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Q fever serology: cutoff determination for microimmunofluorescence

HT Dupont, X Thirion and D Raoult
Unite des Rickettsies, CNRS EP J 0054, Marseille, France.

Q fever, a worldwide zoonosis caused by Coxiella burnetii, lacks clinical specificity and may present as acute or chronic disease. Because of this polymorphism, serological confirmation is necessary to assess the diagnosis. Although microimmunofluorescence is our reference technique, the cutoff titers that are currently used to make a diagnosis of active or chronic Q fever were determined years ago with limited series of patients and sera. We determined the titers of immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgA against both phases (I and II) of Coxiella burnetii. Rheumatoid factor was removed before testing IgM and IgA. We report here the various cutoff titers and the kinetics of antibody development from 2,218 first serum samples of patients, among whom 208 suffered from acute Q fever and 53 had chronic Q fever. In active Q fever, we have defined a low cutoff (phase II IgG titer < or = 100) below which the diagnosis cannot be made and would need further confirmation and confirmed a high cutoff (phase II IgG titer > or = 200 and phase II IgM titer > or = 50) over which the diagnosis can be made. For chronic Q fever diagnosis, phase I IgA titers are not contributive despite previous works claiming their usefulness; a phase I IgG titer of > or = 800 is highly predictive (98%) and sensitive (100%). We have also studied the possibility of rejecting or evoking the diagnosis of chronic Q fever by phase II IgG and IgA titers. This method is useful when phase I testing is not available, but the sensitivity remains low (57%).


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.